jeffterns8

5 ms·

1.
by jeffterns8 5y ago
How old are we talking? I've worked with versions of VS since VS 2005 and don't recall ever having issues with project structuring.
2.
by jeffterns8 5y ago
Other than bungee cords for small pools/space usage, can't say I've heard of such drag methods, only of resistance training outside of the pool. Though, I didn't mean to take the analogy off-topic, maybe I got too litera
3.
by jeffterns8 5y ago
That can be said about languages, libraries, plugins, any tools you choose to make use of. It's just about sticking to good practices and understanding what you're using instead of choosing to be a bad dev. That shouldn't req
4.
by jeffterns8 5y ago
That's just confusing big-brand mature IDE suites as the definition for IDE though. Any dev working on an actual project is going to be using those tools with plugins/extensions, configured as an IDE. A dev would require completel
5.
by jeffterns8 5y ago
The "programming text editors"/"code editors" of now that are used in place of traditional IDEs are practically always extended to, by definition, being an IDE, albeit a leaner, more custom-fit one.
6.
by jeffterns8 5y ago
Well the analogy doesn't actually allow for a starter/bad swimmer as they drown first. Also, swimmers don't swim with weights to improve technique or strength. I'd expect it would result in unorthodox or worsened techniq
7.
by jeffterns8 5y ago
Poor project management != fault of IDE, it's the one responsible for choosing to configure the project in said way. That's not dismissing the fact that VS and other IDEs allow, and even recommend, nasty setups but, unless they fo
8.
by jeffterns8 5y ago
The comments have just devolved into people arguing or confusing mature big-brand IDEs, with excessive and all-encompassing features, as the definition for an IDE. Anything lesser, they're calling a simple code editor but, by actual de
9.
by jeffterns8 5y ago
A lot of this is starting to result in talking semantics of what an IDE is. A powerful/smart code editor, extended to have the functionality most will ever use an IDE for (and definitely incorporating the base definition of what an IDE
10.
by jeffterns8 5y ago
You mean when you or a team chooses to embed them into the project's workflow to that degree? Or are you talking about the worst IDEs no one should use while sounding like it is a general IDE issue with the industry standards? Any dece
11.
by jeffterns8 5y ago
To be clear, this comment is about IDEs for common languages where they are a viable and general consideration as the topic is about IDEs as a whole. Platforms and/or languages where IDEs are commonly known as limited/awful, with