jeffers_hanging

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by jeffers_hanging 12y ago

   Your personal theory is very correct.
2. 2.▲
   by jeffers_hanging 12y ago

   It's very funny to hear you say that. Full article assumption based on the assumptions of the authors. The truth is much easier and more interesting. Amazon launches minimum viable products, doing as little as possible engineering and
3. 3.▲
   by jeffers_hanging 12y ago

   Seismic shift inside Amazon. S-team now emphasizing making money on the previous "strategic" projects. Dismissing directors and restructuring projects currently scored unprofitable. Project I was worked on is reevaluated to maybe
4. 4.▲
   by jeffers_hanging 12y ago

   Figures would look even worse but selling Korean unit exception padded result.
5. 5.▲
   by jeffers_hanging 12y ago

   I worked in AWS. OP flatters AWS arguing that they take care to make money and assuming that they are developing advanced technologies. That't not working as Amazon. Glacier is S3, with the added code to S3 that waits. That is all that