jedsmith

40 ms·

331.
by jedsmith 16y ago
Now it's up to the registries. From a nearby thread on NANOG, the forecasted exhaustion dates of the individual registries: http://www.tndh.net/~tony/ietf/IPv4-rir-pools.jpg
332.
by jedsmith 16y ago
> If so, I'd have flagged this for being GPL software on the app store. Which is probably why they don't have a flag application button.
333.
IPv4 is depleted: Final five blocks allocated to registries(mailman.nanog.org)
241 points by jedsmith 16y ago|105 comments
334.
by jedsmith 16y ago
That doesn't really answer nhangen's question or the assertion that he made.
335.
by jedsmith 16y ago
At the risk of being pedantic (and maybe too American), isn't this a promise from politicians that it will be overturned? The title might be masking that a little bit... (The important words in my question being "promise" and "politicians
336.
by jedsmith 16y ago
I grabbed VLC before they got it removed, and it still runs for me. It has survived several iTunes syncs, too, and even a restore.
337.
by jedsmith 16y ago
No, that's not correct at all. Under OCILLA/DMCA, counter-notification cannot be accepted by your provider and is not legally usable unless access to the alleged offending material has been completely prevented . 17 USC 512(d)(3). The
338.
by jedsmith 16y ago
> As far as tweaking in production goes, its usually better to launch and iterate, than to sit and try to make it perfect before launch. So tweak on a staging site is my point (and has been all along). If I refresh the page and suddenly
339.
by jedsmith 16y ago
Before I began my response to you I scrolled through your responses in this thread. I remember your responses regarding VideoLAN's successes against Applidium, too, so that weighs in to what I'm about to write. > Well, the designer wasn
340.
by jedsmith 16y ago
That's a very bold place to put "Made by Argon", especially at that size. Is the Web site about who made it or is that auxiliary information? If the latter, that's the wrong spot for that graphic, and I wouldn't have let them get away wit
341.
by jedsmith 16y ago
> If Google is scared that Bing is "stealing" their search results, they should quit making those results public in a way where people can "steal" them. I'm curious how you'd implement that idea.
342.
by jedsmith 16y ago
Well, if you notice, they toed the water first. Google didn't fire right off the bat with the hard-hitting blog entry, but instead basically gave a more detailed version of the same thing to Danny Sullivan. They wanted to see how Microsoft
343.
by jedsmith 16y ago
This is anticipated to be the allocation of the final five IPv4 /8s.
344.
"Significant" NRO/ICANN announcement regarding IPv4 on Thursday(nro.net)
2 points by jedsmith 16y ago|2 comments
345.
by jedsmith 16y ago
Posterous enforces http:// on related links on the left. It wasn't that I wanted to hide my e-mail, but more that I never felt like throwing it over there since it required editing the HTML. Since you mentioned it, though, I took the oppo
346.
by jedsmith 16y ago
I've honestly never understood this mindset, and this isn't the first time I've seen it. I'm willing to learn if someone is willing to explain it to me. The information is there , but please don't share it visibly. Make people look for i
347.
by jedsmith 16y ago
This needs a better headline, given the gravity of the announcement. IPv6 is by no means here , and really has nothing to do with this news item. To me, "IPv6 is here" says absolutely nothing about the real news here - APNIC having receive
348.
The end of IPv4: 39/8 and 106/8 allocated to APNIC(computerworld.com)
1 points by jedsmith 16y ago|0 comments
349.
by jedsmith 16y ago
Along with "$" replacing the "S" in MS.
350.
by jedsmith 16y ago
Having worked in television news, I can give testament that these maps are, with no exception that I can think of, generated by a dedicated software package. Graphics people figured out a while ago that everybody needs maps, and reinventing
351.
by jedsmith 16y ago
> For starters, some embedded controllers in racks in the auxilliary deisel generator control rooms have EPROMs which have been known to be erased by camera flashes in the past Not being in EE, I didn't know that this was possible; and,
352.
by jedsmith 16y ago
Anyone else notice that the headline authoritatively declares that it was a hack, then the article copy indicates that they're not sure? Shocker, right?
353.
by jedsmith 16y ago
That's assuming the author and the submitter are the same person.
354.
by jedsmith 16y ago
Based on anecdotes, it sounds like GoDaddy has bigger problems.
355.
by jedsmith 16y ago
Dupe of: - http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1512930 - http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=594210 I don't mind being reminded to see if there's anything new, though.
356.
by jedsmith 16y ago
Even though they denied it, I'm willing to bet that SuSE (and others) made the move after realizing the Reiser community was about to be abruptly beheaded.
357.
by jedsmith 16y ago
> Oh, and reiserfs sucks. I was with you until here. T'so is quoted as writing that btrfs has a lot of the same design ideas of ReiserFS, and that he supports btrfs as the way forward (he particularly disliked Hans and Namesys, though):
358.
by jedsmith 16y ago
That's a good post, and I'm glad Brett took the time to share his thoughts. Characterizing me personally as a naysayer is missing my point entirely. Throughout this whole thread, I've mentioned that I have questions . The closest I got to
359.
by jedsmith 16y ago
That's what I've been told for the last two years -- it'll come, give it time, etc. Then the developer of a library I use announces that a port to Python 3 is unlikely two years after Python 3 is released, and I'm left with even more questi
360.
by jedsmith 16y ago
What if, in your statement, you've unwittingly come across the answer? Why wait for Python 2 libraries to port ... maybe there's a hole in the market here for Python 3 libraries to outright replace the Python 2 ones? It sucks, yes, but it'l

More ›