Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
jedsmith
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
35 ms
·
271.
▲
by
jedsmith
16y ago
I get having a passion for your product -- I really do. Some of the responses here from Jason are on the border line, though, and I think they are making the situation worse overall. I wish, for his sake, that he'd have quit while ahead. Wi
272.
▲
by
jedsmith
16y ago
Is the personal account information for the submitting individual really necessary for your point? Did the submitter give you permission to tell us about his ticket history and account actions? Although relatively harmless, it seems like pl
273.
▲
by
jedsmith
16y ago
Not by a mile. Windows 7 literally beats Vista to death -- it's a lot snappier and (to me, anyway) a lot more stable. Let's not forget that it actually runs in 512 MB of RAM, and I can attest to this. I'm an OS X guy by trade and employment
274.
▲
by
jedsmith
16y ago
http://dropbox.jedsmith.org/graph.png
275.
▲
by
jedsmith
16y ago
So does Python.
276.
▲
by
jedsmith
16y ago
I've just started playing with Fabric, and I like your take on its functionality better. If they're resistant to merge you, why not fork into something new? You definitely have something very useful there, from a casual read.
277.
▲
by
jedsmith
16y ago
> Higher level tech would reveal the cablebox is running a version of MS Windows that only supports 2.0 sound over HDMI. No equipment associated with U-verse runs Windows, aside from a PC connected to it.
278.
▲
by
jedsmith
16y ago
> (a 2wire, don't know the model details) Probably 3800HG (V?), or something else in the 3000 series. I haven't been inside AT&T for many years, but Lightspeed/U-verse is all the 2wire 3000-series ("MediaPortal?" Fuzzy on that). Whe
279.
▲
by
jedsmith
16y ago
http://code.google.com/p/googlefontdirectory/issues/detail?i... http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=598166 and https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=626966 are linked from there, but they seem to indicate it's done.
280.
▲
by
jedsmith
16y ago
Click a font. http://www.google.com/webfonts/family?family=Astloch&sub... Complete with a link to: SIL Open Font License, 1.1 I would imagine they don't link to it on the index because they're reserving the capability for fonts to hav
281.
▲
by
jedsmith
16y ago
Really? Loads fine in 3.6.13 and 4.0b11 for me (OS X).
282.
▲
by
jedsmith
16y ago
I didn't mean that I don't like the request/response model. I meant going beyond that, by which I meant voicemail, hold music, extensions, conference calls, and so on, seems like it would be difficult to implement with the Twilio model. Tha
283.
▲
by
jedsmith
16y ago
FreePBX/Asterisk is a good alternative to this, if a pain to administer. Twilio seems great for a request/response Web app, but going much further than that seems like it'd be a challenge (by design; Twilio seems to emphasize that model and
284.
▲
by
jedsmith
16y ago
I use this approach and it works absolutely wonderfully. The single, small, annoying caveat (there is always one) is that after an unexpected reboot, you will have lingering dead sockets; if you forget to delete them before starting ssh, ss
285.
▲
by
jedsmith
16y ago
No, it has to do with the single sign-on conversion. Docs is enabled: http://dropbox.jedsmith.org/hn_1.png But I get this when I click through: http://dropbox.jedsmith.org/hn_2.png It was a caveat I was informed of when I performed the
286.
▲
by
jedsmith
16y ago
I'm not sure how to read these, but it reads like this one is expired and done, no?
287.
▲
by
jedsmith
16y ago
Very cool. I wish I could use it: Google Docs is not available for jedsmith.org. Learn more about Google products you can use with jed@jedsmith.org. I love the Google Apps Unified Account, but it seems like every now and then I run into y
288.
▲
by
jedsmith
16y ago
> You're being deliberately trollish Because I refuse to walk the party line on Free Software? > bringing in religion, it's a dumb insult and I could turn around and call your arguments religious and it wouldn't have any meaning eit
289.
▲
by
jedsmith
16y ago
You do realize that by demonstrating surprise to the OP that she is a woman, you're directly reinforcing the same gender bias that you hate in our industry? Wow, I didn't expect you to learn Django! Bravo!
290.
▲
by
jedsmith
16y ago
It's like saying "congratulations on your promotion to CEO, Fred, and even more so because you're black. Cool that we've started to move on from the whole racism thing in America, huh?" Regardless of what you meant, you're pointing out the
291.
▲
by
jedsmith
16y ago
> (Actually, I think their is a license that basically does with you'd think putting something into the pubic domain does, I just forget the name). CC0? https://creativecommons.org/choose/zero/ > This is true of pretty much all li
292.
▲
by
jedsmith
16y ago
And if you criticize it in even the lightest way, the religious fervor I mentioned before brings every free software supporter out to impale you. I can't tell you how many times I've been called a corporate shill or, quote, "M$ fanboi" beca
293.
▲
by
jedsmith
16y ago
> One is the freedom of a bill of rights, the other is the freedom of anarchy. How is that even remotely a good analogy? Both of them are licenses that let you read the source, redistribute it, and modify it. They differ in what you hav
294.
▲
by
jedsmith
16y ago
> If some wants to use it in proprietary software they cannot, because if they did they would be unable to then share it with their neighbor. So he isn't free to do what he wishes with the software. Free is one of the most overloaded wo
295.
▲
by
jedsmith
16y ago
> People have a sense of entitlement WRT open source code, I think. As if it's "open source," it should be under whatever terms they want not those of the original author. I think that's why so many people bitch about copyleft licenses.
296.
▲
by
jedsmith
16y ago
It was a poor choice of word. I agree, and have revised my remark.
297.
▲
by
jedsmith
16y ago
Firstly, thank you for taking the time to disagree with something in a manner that I can read. I voted you up just for that. > I think you are taking it out of context. Edit: Oh, okay, on third read I see what you mean. I stand by my co
298.
▲
by
jedsmith
16y ago
> Don't like the terms of an author's library? Go write your own then. I really hate this attitude. Isn't one of the advantages of the Internet bringing developers together to work on things? Can't we put our collective capabilities tow
299.
▲
by
jedsmith
16y ago
I feel the same way about the GPL, in that it dictates very strong boundaries about what can and cannot be done with the code you are distributing. I don't personally feel that the tradeoff is acceptable to achieve a goal of preventing cor
300.
▲
by
jedsmith
16y ago
As a UX note, I've always quietly loved autocompletes that aren't just a flat list of terms, but actually contain structured information organized in an intuitive fashion. The design of the suggestions on SeatGeek is fantastic.
More ›