Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
jeangenie
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
31.
▲
by
jeangenie
12y ago
Why would the statement need to provide any basis? It's merely a carefully worded expression of a decision that's already been made. You will find even recent history rife with examples.
32.
▲
by
jeangenie
12y ago
I agree that the presence of that single qualifier casts an irrevocably ominous shadow over the entire sentiment. In a purely-hypothetical dystopia it could be the basis of more invasive monitoring and control capabilities over network in
33.
▲
by
jeangenie
12y ago
So whole societies should sacrifice their privacy so someone can have a hypothetical chance at recovering a stolen car more quickly?
34.
▲
by
jeangenie
12y ago
Could also be useful for interactive walkthroughs of interfaces.
35.
▲
by
jeangenie
12y ago
Definitely Latin. By the time Aurelius was emperor the Greeks had already been overtaken by the Romans. Edit: Incidentally, a simple Google would've shown it was written in Greek: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medit
36.
▲
by
jeangenie
12y ago
A) Most users will never open their computer for any reason, including upgrading RAM. B) Apple wants to capture the cost of upgrading their hardware in the future.
37.
▲
by
jeangenie
12y ago
Well said!
38.
▲
by
jeangenie
12y ago
I'll have to rewatch. My family and I were also discussing this same idea in relation to Minority Report . Are these instances of life imitating art?
39.
▲
by
jeangenie
12y ago
I think the term "legalization" needs to be qualified. The situation is moving towards extremely limited government-controlled privatization. Citizens can buy recreational pot in an approved store but it's still illegal to gr
40.
▲
by
jeangenie
12y ago
It is obvious but completely ignores my question. As an aside, I can't think of many governments that would willingly divest themselves of access to tax revenue/citizens.
41.
▲
by
jeangenie
12y ago
I often wonder whether it's even possible to sustain a functioning representative democracy at this scale without some major work.
42.
▲
by
jeangenie
12y ago
Interesting idea.
43.
▲
by
jeangenie
12y ago
My assertion is that, with the backing of enterprises raking in 12 figures annually, it's within their operational capability to obtain all the necessary parts to do exactly that. To be fair, I think it's entirely possible that th
44.
▲
by
jeangenie
12y ago
As an aside, I have most assuredly been guilt of this on HN and elsewhere but have been making an effort to curtail it. We'll see how that goes.
45.
▲
by
jeangenie
12y ago
Are you asking because you plan on doing so? I'd be interested to hear what you find. Here's something to get you started: http://online.wsj.com/articles/j-p-morgan-fined-92-million-b...
46.
▲
by
jeangenie
12y ago
It's certainly logical but my question is if it will actually impact Mexican cartel revenue as much as some people claim. If the alternative to cartel weed is industrially-farmed weed propping up another unholy conglomerate I'm no
47.
▲
by
jeangenie
12y ago
What do Americans use to buy drugs? Hint: It's US dollars.
48.
▲
by
jeangenie
12y ago
What would stop the cartels from investing in legal storefronts and capturing profits regardless? (This certainly shouldn't be construed as an argument for the morass we have now, just an interesting aside.)
49.
▲
by
jeangenie
12y ago
Not sure what your point is. It's okay for government representatives to threaten citizens for circumventing laws that are demonstrably foolish? Regardless you should step back and think about how a representative democracy should fun
50.
▲
by
jeangenie
12y ago
This sort of exchange is unfortunately the dominant mode of discourse--not just online either. Both sides loudly proclaim the foolishness of the other without ever having an opportunity to establish some reasonable grounds on which an actua
51.
▲
by
jeangenie
12y ago
It bothers me that Wired occasionally puts out interesting pieces but churns out puff-pieces on products and companies daily. Thanks, Condé Nast.
52.
▲
by
jeangenie
12y ago
This problem is precisely what leads me to doubt the value of what we currently call higher education. To put it bluntly (and in a slightly exaggerated manner), in exchange for your tens/hundreds of thousands of dollars, you get obsole
53.
▲
by
jeangenie
12y ago
An idea's utility is often orthogonal to its complexity.
54.
▲
by
jeangenie
12y ago
I prefer yours. Nice work!
55.
▲
by
jeangenie
12y ago
This idea is the basis for mafia and similar organizations the world over.
56.
▲
by
jeangenie
12y ago
The hilarious/frightening thing is that one can analyze most public bills, projects, or proposals and discover similar shortcomings.
57.
▲
by
jeangenie
12y ago
Commenting so I can find in the future.
58.
▲
by
jeangenie
12y ago
Is this your own translation?
59.
▲
by
jeangenie
12y ago
I'd be interested to see raw numbers since there are many possible values for y=x/3.7.
60.
▲
by
jeangenie
12y ago
> Controlling western media on a useful scale is way beyond this limit. Define "useful scale". There are many examples of the government controlling mass media.
More ›