Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
jdw64
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
37 ms
·
541.
▲
by
jdw64
4mo ago
Someday, there might be mathematics designed for AI. Mathematics that only a tiny fraction of humans can understand, but a different kind of mathematics might emerge. I wonder if we would still call it mathematics. What would happen if a no
542.
▲
by
jdw64
4mo ago
But if I had to write briefly without actually searching anywhere, this is what I think. Normally, before writing a comment, I search for other people's thoughts and filter my own through them. But if I had to be sincere, without searc
543.
▲
by
jdw64
4mo ago
I'm sorry, but I didn't use AI. The thing that's really hard about this is that the language I write in is Korean, and in the process of translating my words, the sentences and context I can use are limited. Most of the time,
544.
▲
by
jdw64
4mo ago
This is generally rooted in the Confucian thought that is broadly spread across Northeast Asia. To think about your logic a bit more precisely, Orwell's metaphor is about why the power to trample others ultimately arises. In Confuciani
545.
▲
by
jdw64
4mo ago
People feel competent and important when they teach others. This desire is so primal, as you said, that it can even be seen in young children. That's why people unconsciously try to teach others, and it often creates problems in relati
546.
▲
by
jdw64
4mo ago
孟子曰:「人之患在好爲人師。」 Mencius said: "The trouble with people is that they are too fond of being teachers to others." 仁者如射,射者正己而後發。發而不中,不怨勝己者,反求諸己而已矣。 The benevolent person is like an archer. The archer corrects their own posture before
547.
▲
by
jdw64
4mo ago
Reading your comment, I realize that the local context was something I had been missing, and your point makes a lot of sense. I think I should revise it like this "The online self used to be an identity that was managed within small, p
548.
▲
by
jdw64
4mo ago
The internet has changed because attempts to bring commercial interests into it have been too successful. In the old days, people were physically connected, so if you made hateful remarks, you could face physical threats. But now, it's
549.
▲
by
jdw64
4mo ago
I have doubts about the Palantir model. This company doesn't even build its own AI. And the strategy they're pushing ultimately seems to be an attempt to standardize Palantir's topology in defense and healthcare. In other wor
550.
▲
by
jdw64
4mo ago
I'm always grateful to arXiv. It allows non-scientists like me to access high-quality papers anytime. Thank you, always
551.
▲
by
jdw64
4mo ago
>AI adoption and the associated gains are unevenly distributed.
552.
▲
by
jdw64
4mo ago
Usually, this kind of work is difficult with large models. They either get rejected by policy or don't produce stable results. So you have to use local models, but local models have inconsistent quality and the setup is complicated. Th
553.
▲
by
jdw64
4mo ago
cool
554.
▲
by
jdw64
4mo ago
When I work as a freelancer, I get a lot of requests lately to create fake AI manipulated images for scams. Especially requests to generate fake IDs using AI. Personally, I feel that there is a need for AI watermarks on image generation mod
555.
▲
by
jdw64
4mo ago
Amazing. This is exactly the kind of content I wanted to put on my homepage. Thank you
556.
▲
by
jdw64
4mo ago
Thank you so much. Sometimes I wish there were more documents out there that organized the historical aspects of programming like this.
557.
▲
by
jdw64
4mo ago
thanks! I checked the link and there are indeed quite a few inaccuracies in the initial part. I'll go through it and make corrections.
558.
▲
by
jdw64
4mo ago
I studied the history of OOP a while back because I was curious, and I organized what I learned into my personal wiki[1]. From what I remember, there were quite a few different perspectives on it. One view traces OOP's practical ancest
559.
▲
by
jdw64
4mo ago
You're not wrong, but from what I understand, the issue really comes down to on-site personnel and supervisory staffing. As for the 996 culture, I agree to some extent. My Chinese friends hated it too. But in China, there's this t
560.
▲
by
jdw64
4mo ago
There were probably many complex factors at play. Personally, I think the biggest one, as TSMC's Morris Chang said, is the inhumane working conditions imposed on highly educated workers. But there were likely also issues around permitt
561.
▲
by
jdw64
4mo ago
The industry inherently deals with extremely hazardous chemicals, and on top of that, during semiconductor production, there are many things that have to be recorded and tracked. A lot of the processes are automated, but at the points where
562.
▲
by
jdw64
4mo ago
I'm not saying Asian culture is the main factor. Yes, it's true that authoritarian governance driven by dictatorial regimes and chaebol politics has played a strong role, but fundamentally, the long working hours are simply inhere
563.
▲
by
jdw64
4mo ago
Realistically, when it comes to the semiconductor market, there aren't many viable options outside of East Asia. I don't mean this in the sense that East Asians were somehow "chosen," but rather that the semiconductor in
564.
▲
by
jdw64
4mo ago
> it should be in those point cuts, or maybe not all of them. I really enjoy hearing these kinds of war stories from senior programmers. I don't have a LISP background, but having learned Haskell, your point resonates perfectly. In
565.
▲
by
jdw64
4mo ago
It feels like identity and personal branding. The Western perspective and the Eastern perspective definitely seem different.
566.
▲
by
jdw64
4mo ago
What I'm feeling is that this narcissistic personality might actually be a signal that society rewards. I saw a news report recently saying that narcissistic traits are often found in successful CEOs. In my view, maybe society is desig
567.
▲
by
jdw64
4mo ago
After reading this post, I got curious and went back to read the original AOP paper. What the OP argued feels like just top-down design. These days, the term 'SPEC-driven' is trending, but it seems like just another word for top-d
568.
▲
by
jdw64
4mo ago
Thanks to your summary, I finally understand. So it's about whether it's a small tool that only handles init, or whether it handles multiple layers. That's the issue. Thank you. I didn't know why there was a debate since
569.
▲
by
jdw64
4mo ago
I gooogled it, but I still don't really understand why there's a debate. Because OpenRC and systemd don't even seem like comparable things—OpenRC is much smaller. And from what Google shows me, one is written in C and the oth
570.
▲
by
jdw64
4mo ago
I mainly use Ubuntu, so I know about systemd, but what is OpenRC? Why is there such a split, and why are people arguing about it in the comments? Could someone kindly explain it to me? I only know how to control Linux through systemctl, and
More ›