jdw64

34 ms·

571.
by jdw64 4mo ago
It seems like the design is flawed, probably because the scoring structure and conditions are wrong. And originally, due to the nature of LLMs, even if the input is unstructured, when you design something like a RAG system, you usually need
572.
by jdw64 4mo ago
>Bureaucrats do not need AI to fall victim to cognitive surrender. That is true. Organizations have long been surrendering cognitively to outsourcing, consulting, and brand names. They buy systems they do not understand and delegate requ
573.
by jdw64 4mo ago
Reading posts on HN, I notice that even across different programming domains, surprisingly similar problems emerge. Seeing this, I can't help but think that programming might ultimately be a matter of organizational theory. Conway&#x27
574.
by jdw64 4mo ago
Most people overestimate themselves. Everyone deludes themselves into thinking they're talented. And in fact, most people are talented at something. The problem is this: the moment you think you're talented, you stop growing. As y
575.
by jdw64 4mo ago
I use Google Chrome, and it doesn't show up for me either
576.
by jdw64 4mo ago
AI code usually creates fake 'cohesion.' It looks good on the surface. But in reality, it's often just optimized for the moment, weak to change. After reading Code Complete 4 or 5 times, I became obsessed with the idea that I
577.
by jdw64 4mo ago
Thank goodness I use a GC language
578.
by jdw64 4mo ago
You don't dismiss me, so I'd like to respond to your comments within the bounds of my own knowledge, even though I can't compare to a programmer as skilled as you. I don't think that's entirely wrong. But human code
579.
by jdw64 4mo ago
But do people actually find these vulnerabilities on their own, or are they using LLMs? I was curious about how these vulnerabilities work, so I tried asking my dear friend Mr. CLAUDE, but he immediately threw an error and ended the session
580.
by jdw64 4mo ago
I'm going through each one, and it's fascinating to see things like this. The UAF principle in c-ares is really interesting. The problem ultimately came from not being able to prevent stale pointers. The attack works by figuring
581.
by jdw64 4mo ago
Where can I get the API?
582.
by jdw64 4mo ago
As a programmer, what I feel when I see fintech programmers each speaking from their own different experiences and perspectives is that it makes me wonder what it really means to be good at programming. What user xlii said about not storing
583.
by jdw64 4mo ago
Most countries are facing similar problems. In the US, it's the millennial problem. In France, it's HENRY (High Earner, Not Rich Yet). In Korea, it's the '20-something male' issue. In Japan, it's the 'gene
584.
by jdw64 4mo ago
Thank you for explaining my point more logically and coherently. I'll read it over.
585.
by jdw64 4mo ago
Someday, human mathematicians might end up doing proofs for proofs. When a codebase gets too large, you eventually can't understand all of it. Even code I wrote myself, I can't fully grasp it. In those cases, we usually write test
586.
by jdw64 4mo ago
Wow, this is really fusion. I like it.
587.
by jdw64 4mo ago
I think you could be right. I do use excessive error-handling code and verbose comments — that's true. But most of my time is spent on delivery, and the biggest problem with delivery is that if a bug occurs during runtime, the client c
588.
by jdw64 4mo ago
There are also differences in usage patterns, and differences in the quality of thinking. Not all programming revolves around Western open source Well, I guess it's just a difference of opinion on who's right
589.
by jdw64 4mo ago
To elaborate a bit more: open source is about 'symbolic capital' — it's about building a reputation that says, 'I can write code at this level.' Commercial closed source, on the other hand, is about 'I need to
590.
by jdw64 4mo ago
Open source is much better. Closed source is mostly considered 'done' as long as it just works. One is a 'craft,' the other is 'survival for delivery.'
591.
by jdw64 4mo ago
You're not wrong. But programming isn't something only talented people do.
592.
by jdw64 4mo ago
Maybe I'll know once I try it? Honestly, for small functions or methods, I don't think there's a huge difference between models. But the larger the code gets, the more noticeable the difference seems to be. Personally, I thin
593.
by jdw64 4mo ago
There's a lot of tacit knowledge in programming. -Why do you cut API boundaries this way? -Why do you change the order of struct fields? -Why do you deliberately insert padding? Most of it depends on the background and context. Sometim
594.
by jdw64 4mo ago
When I searched for papers on using LLMs, I found that typically, you can have an LLM generate code and then ask it to find GitHub projects similar to that code. Then you can learn by looking at the pull requests and seeing how they structu
595.
by jdw64 4mo ago
I think GPT writes code the best. How well will it write in version 5.6? It gives me chills. Recently, I went head-to-head with GPT on nearly 2,000 lines of code, and GPT's solution was superior and faster. I even referenced multiple c
596.
by jdw64 4mo ago
You're right. Because conversations with AI don't force me to deal with boring code, don't scratch my ego, and they flatter me. On top of that, talking to smart developers in real life is exhausting. Putting aside whether the
597.
by jdw64 4mo ago
I talk almost exclusively with AI these days. There's no one around me who knows programming, I get tired of reading code for projects I'm not interested in, and the projects I am interested in are too difficult, so I just talk wi
598.
by jdw64 4mo ago
I always feel that people want one central place to prove their abilities, but when that central place becomes corrupted, it's hard to break away from it. Because the authority of that place feels as if it's tied to your own autho
599.
by jdw64 4mo ago
thanks, i will read it
600.
by jdw64 4mo ago
I'm amazed that you're already preparing for AGI infrastructure.

More ›