jdrc

23 ms·

211.
by jdrc 5y ago
iframe is a full page. i mean some HTML code, a div or some text or a table etc. the kind of things we load with Ajax. The equivalent of <img>, but for HTML content : <remotehtml src=" https://twitter.com/snip&#
212.
by jdrc 5y ago
there are some masterpieces there. this is the end of clipart and stock images, and the beginning of awesome illustrations in every article.
213.
by jdrc 5y ago
i was responding re/ security and privacy. showing that the tweet is deleted would be expected behavior
214.
by jdrc 5y ago
Are we going to have a lot of similar posts? This sounds like expected bevahiour if you're inserting someone's JavaScript in your page
215.
by jdrc 5y ago
i think not. before bezos, elon and zuck they were not owned by the richest-of-the-rich.
216.
by jdrc 5y ago
why would they?
217.
by jdrc 5y ago
iframe is loading a whole page with script permissions (and sandboxed). it seems there isnt any tag for adding a remote snippet of html, like you can do with ajax
218.
by jdrc 5y ago
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/55695667/adsense-injecti... https://support.google.com/adsense/thread/20491540/auto-ads-...
219.
by jdrc 5y ago
There should be an HTML <remote> tag or something that downloads and embeds HTML from a remote site without scripting
220.
by jdrc 5y ago
Oh boy wait until you see what adsense does
221.
by jdrc 5y ago
Bezos is not happy https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/elon-musks-twitter-i...
222.
by jdrc 5y ago
Expensive is relative
223.
by jdrc 5y ago
Ok then, if comparing censorship by the us govt vs private companies it's clear who wins
224.
by jdrc 5y ago
The comparable cases are Bezos & Zuck, the parallel is Berlusconi. Yes it's all scary
225.
by jdrc 5y ago
I sympathize but very rich people owning the media never ends well
226.
by jdrc 5y ago
The govt, municipalities etc. Public spaces are public and the whole thing can be decentralized so it s not compute and bw heavy. It should be very cheap compared to e.g. roads
227.
by jdrc 5y ago
Small potatoes compared to the ugliness around the world
228.
by jdrc 5y ago
Yup, we actually need public twitters. Nothing fancy, no recommendations, not even sophisticated antispam, just simple follow list like rss with feedback. People can learn the self-curate
229.
by jdrc 5y ago
In most of the world yes, but america's laws are unique
230.
by jdrc 5y ago
But twitter isn't inherently limited by airtime or bandwidth, it's in principle infinite.
231.
by jdrc 5y ago
Elon's twitter account is his most valuable asset, and responsible for much of the rest
232.
by jdrc 5y ago
Does American government censor the press? Or mail?
233.
by jdrc 5y ago
the better the camera of my phone the less I use it. there are so many good photos of everything, it's just, what's the point ?
234.
by jdrc 5y ago
or to make a news aggregator hehe
235.
by jdrc 5y ago
php
236.
by jdrc 5y ago
the interface is crap in general. it's 2022 and just now the page randomly reloads as i was reading an interesting thread, i lost my position as it was 15 or so infinite scrolls down. How can it be in this day and age i can't scro
237.
by jdrc 5y ago
domains do that too It's good. we dont need perfect systems, neither should an email be tied to our real existence or our whole existence . "Real name" identities was a mistake. Semi-anonymous, expendable identity is better
238.
by jdrc 5y ago
they block it because they can. if more and more (important) people hosted their own mail, blockers wouldnt block so easily. Email is still in principle decentralized
239.
by jdrc 5y ago
no but yea, something like that
240.
by jdrc 5y ago
you make it sound like women were using something else?

More ›