jdksmdbtbdnmsm

12 ms·

1.
by jdksmdbtbdnmsm 3y ago
Apple and Microsoft would simply never allow that to happen. End of story. The Open Source "community" is hell-bent on finding technical solutions for political problems, and this is the best among countless examples of why it&#x2
2.
by jdksmdbtbdnmsm 3y ago
Great solution if you're looking to spend hours installing CS6 built for a 1280x720 display, or CS18 (high DPI support) with very buggy operation and constant crashes. I've been there, done that.
3.
by jdksmdbtbdnmsm 3y ago
Behold our priorities as a society
4.
by jdksmdbtbdnmsm 3y ago
In a capitalist society, class is the predominant relationship one has with their society. I know this is pretty obvious and may not entirely answer your question, but many people find it very difficult to swallow this reality these days an
5.
by jdksmdbtbdnmsm 3y ago
This is almost entirely just plain false.
6.
by jdksmdbtbdnmsm 3y ago
Historically mere "movements" don't accomplish anything. You need actual strategy. Not just attention wrangling. The fact that you haven't shared a strategy shows me you're ineffective at anything except wasting peo
7.
by jdksmdbtbdnmsm 3y ago
> There are lots of business ventures that are illegal or heavily regulated. So????
8.
by jdksmdbtbdnmsm 3y ago
The use of proportions rather than actual totals means the number of recruits could have dropped by that same 12.4% in every category, in which case the focus on race is completely meaningless.
9.
by jdksmdbtbdnmsm 3y ago
> Another article is more explicit about exactly who isn’t joining the military anymore. The article doesn't confirm whether the total of any other groups is dropping, but it can be inferred from the numbers given that recruiting i
10.
by jdksmdbtbdnmsm 3y ago
> the little things do add up This is the first thing that anyone who has actually studied historical societal change would have to disagree with. In fact, history almost completely shows that organizing one another and acting strateg
11.
by jdksmdbtbdnmsm 3y ago
Is there a contest for the most stuffy and uncomfortable product reveal?
12.
by jdksmdbtbdnmsm 3y ago
Capitalism is literally defined by the ability to exercise capital to accumulate more of it, which is literally the only way for a monopoly to exist. By definition, capitalism has nothing to do with so-called "free markets".
13.
by jdksmdbtbdnmsm 3y ago
> price caps make a lot more sense to me. Will never happen. Comcast has the power, not the politicians. As Marx showed us 150 years ago, a state under capitalism tends to become a capitalist state.
14.
by jdksmdbtbdnmsm 3y ago
I read Ages of Dischord! I think Peter Turchin has a lot of very valuable insights. Big fan! Also a great book for HN readers. :)
15.
by jdksmdbtbdnmsm 3y ago
> Why are we doing this? someone got promoted
16.
by jdksmdbtbdnmsm 3y ago
> This is why… uh… people started divorcing more? Yes. Divorce rates inversely correlate with wealth and income measurements. Poor people divorce a lot more than rich people, which is just common sense for any serious person interested
17.
by jdksmdbtbdnmsm 3y ago
that usually depends on who wants to know
18.
by jdksmdbtbdnmsm 3y ago
it exhibits a capacity to be full of shit with a straight face, which makes grant funders happy so grant reviewers view it as job security
19.
by jdksmdbtbdnmsm 3y ago
> Same, but why would others live there ? Because has more theoretical opportunity than where they live and they can't move to Europe. This is not complicated.
20.
by jdksmdbtbdnmsm 3y ago
Copyright law is a nearly perfect conflict in capitalism because profit by way of merely owning capital also has no moral or logical basis. Legitimation of such a system requires extreme propaganda, and the propagandized then read such nons
21.
by jdksmdbtbdnmsm 3y ago
> demand can be specific to a price point This only illustrates that you don't know what demand is, in the context of economics.
22.
by jdksmdbtbdnmsm 3y ago
> Fairly self evident. Not even close > Far fewer married people, many want to live in apartments This has nothing to do with owning a home. > others enjoy renting houses for a few years at a far cheaper rate than being locked in
23.
by jdksmdbtbdnmsm 3y ago
Not a chance, which is why housing prices aren't going down in any parts of the US, including the vast majority of the US that has none of the "California-style" laws that insufferable developers like you despise.
24.
by jdksmdbtbdnmsm 3y ago
The defining characteristic of capitalism is the opportunity to exercise capital to accumulate more capital.
25.
by jdksmdbtbdnmsm 3y ago
A robot ran for president in 2016 and lost.
26.
by jdksmdbtbdnmsm 3y ago
Looking at the data made available by this API, I think it's safe to say this is fine.
27.
by jdksmdbtbdnmsm 3y ago
I didn't say anything about living here. See " investment real estate"
28.
by jdksmdbtbdnmsm 3y ago
> do you expect the 40% price hike during Covid to become permanent? Definitely. US real estate is literally the best investment real estate in the entire world, and it's availabile to the entire world. Prices definitely won't
29.
by jdksmdbtbdnmsm 3y ago
> A shift towards more short term rentals is also reducing the demand for homeownership. Honestly what on Earth are you talking about??? Your logic is not clear at all, and if you're truly trying to claim that less people want to o
30.
by jdksmdbtbdnmsm 3y ago
a short throw probector is far more cumbersome and inconvenient than a tv in that situation

More ›