jdiff

6 ms·

31.
by jdiff 25d ago
Only 5 "contributors," did you block one of the AI bots bouncing around in there?
32.
by jdiff 25d ago
The answers are present in the post we're discussing quite plainly without any reading between the lines necessary. I think the simplicity of the analogy is fitting. If not bait, there are few charitable explanations.
33.
by jdiff 25d ago
How many of these sockpuppets are you going to create?
34.
by jdiff 25d ago
But this isn't happening. To cite someone with closer experience (who also does admit that the "migration issue in Britain is complicated and multi-layered") [0]: > To all of that he adds a dash of Islamophobia, citing “Pa
35.
by jdiff 26d ago
This, too, is a wholly different project that's only interested in the surface fascia of macOS.
36.
by jdiff 26d ago
He explicitly says that nonwhite people feel alien and like they don't belong. He "heartwarming"ly embraces Tommy Robinson's white replacement marches advocating for forced "remigration" as a breath of fresh ai
37.
by jdiff 26d ago
I'm actually the head lead developer in chief president. Now, your cheerios?
38.
by jdiff 26d ago
> Four years and still pre-alpha. Stick a fork in it. Who jammed a toe in your cheerios?
39.
by jdiff 26d ago
Because people who want to forcibly eject, imprison, and torture brown people are Nazis. Evil exists. We can call it by name.
40.
by jdiff 26d ago
Wanting to forcibly eject all brown people isn't enough to call someone radically racist? That's not a middle-of-the-road, agree-to-disagree kind of stance.
41.
by jdiff 26d ago
Many distros don't bother with any of that. Calamares is a fine off-the-shelf installer. GRUB has fine defaults. Desktops have fine defaults. And many distros use those. Custom dotfiles and a way to apply them to a fresh system doesn&#
42.
by jdiff 26d ago
That's a very simplistic and end-user-oriented view of what a distro is. Somebody hosts the infrastructure that Omarchy runs on. Somebody maintains the packages and applies specialized patches and communicates upstream. Omarchy doesn&#
43.
by jdiff 26d ago
SteamOS runs its own infrastructure and is more than a static set of scripts and dotfiles on top of an existing distro.
44.
by jdiff 26d ago
There's a distinct difference between the contributions of Debian and that of Omarchy. Debian is a foundational distro, it's a giant with huge populations standing on its shoulders. It shoulders a large ongoing burden, security gu
45.
by jdiff 26d ago
Of course it's a made up problem, most ultimately are. Programming (and life) are full of bike sheds for those with eyes to see them, does that mean they should not be painted?
46.
by jdiff 27d ago
Obviously no, not only Brits, but the Brits are the ones under discussion because they're the ones being actively threatened with ChatControl laws. Speech is regulated widely in many ways. There is no country with absolute freedom of s
47.
by jdiff 1mo ago
This kind of thought-terminating dogmatism is unwise.
48.
by jdiff 1mo ago
But there are still very many automated accounts. Publicly automated, secretly automated, blatantly automated, not-hidden-but-not-advertised-to-be automated. What caused you to have to shut down when so few others, legitimate, illegitimate,
49.
by jdiff 1mo ago
But Twitter has and embraces that. The bots are all verified. Go on any tweet that mentions crypto or "my friends account got hacked" and dive into the deep well of hidden tweets. Hiding tweets for users without accounts does abso
50.
by jdiff 1mo ago
Careful, let's not put the whole matrix into stasis outside of business hours. Productivity is not the only reason to let these meatbags burn oxygen.
51.
by jdiff 1mo ago
The NFT is the metadata. The metadata is the token that cannot be funged. The image is a wholly separate thing that a token points at, and multiple tokens can point at the same thing just fine. NFTs be be funge-free but images are fully fun
52.
by jdiff 1mo ago
> ~3x the energy of running an LED light for 5 minutes. Why would this not be the energy of running an LED light for 15 minutes?
53.
by jdiff 1mo ago
I don't think they are selling well, either. I was wondering at your source since it would be very atypical for any company to give any numbers at all, let alone a company that's so outwardly sketchy, let alone numbers like "
54.
by jdiff 1mo ago
"Looking now"? Is this something they publicize for some unknowable reason?
55.
by jdiff 1mo ago
Anything that goes into the context window has that going for it. That's a huge part of why Claude's gone absolutely bonkers with genuine, brutal honesty. The system prompt's absolutely stuffed full of those keywords, so now
56.
by jdiff 1mo ago
I don't think the word "amplification" is accurate. I don't know why, but while engineering techbro circles love "multipliers," but those very very rarely exist in real life. You do need a baseline of knowledge
57.
by jdiff 1mo ago
The article mentions this, but this was before CPUs had lids. When delidding a CPU, you have to be very careful not to crack the silicon die that you are applying force directly to. In the case of this Athlon, even care wasn't enough.
58.
by jdiff 1mo ago
You'd need unlimited money and hyperadvanced future technology. There's just no way to get things lined up and no way to reconnect any of it and no way to reclaim or reattach any of the tiny bits of silicon that preferred to becom
59.
by jdiff 1mo ago
You may not be interested in arguing but there are several blatant issues with the statement. If you're not charging the humans driving the software, who are you charging? The weights? The weights + the specific context window that pro
60.
by jdiff 1mo ago
I agree fully that it makes logistical sense. But it is not a legal requirement, and they should not be permitted to use that as an excuse to wash their hands of their own decisions.

More ›