Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
jdiff
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
4 ms
·
61.
▲
by
jdiff
1mo ago
The ruling was that what they did was within the law, not required by law in every detail. They cannot resell the copies. I saw nothing in that ruling that required their destruction, because it is not required. A person can digitize their
62.
▲
by
jdiff
1mo ago
Selling it is not allowed. The inability to sell it does not require its destruction.
63.
▲
by
jdiff
1mo ago
Nowhere in this description did it require destruction of the physical book. This is being done because it's easier to scan a shucked book, and this explanation is circulating because it's easier to blame it on the law and that pe
64.
▲
by
jdiff
1mo ago
Theoretically jobs reward loyalty and wish to maintain institutional knowledge. For some reason right now everyone thinks they can get away without those. And I can't say they're precisely wrong. But as someone working on dumpster
65.
▲
by
jdiff
1mo ago
Or "fukashima", which I think also rules out an AI editing pass at the end. That said, the smell of Claude specifically is pervasive in that comment. Perhaps someone who's ingested a bit too much Anthropic output?
66.
▲
by
jdiff
1mo ago
The ads themselves have been known to do that on many an occasion.
67.
▲
by
jdiff
2mo ago
What are you basing this on?
68.
▲
by
jdiff
2mo ago
This appears to be an individual rather than a company.
69.
▲
by
jdiff
2mo ago
I think we can look upon the collective works of the corporations of the world and agree that the employees do not do that, nor are they expected to.
70.
▲
by
jdiff
2mo ago
That's not a take I was expecting to find here. I've found most LLMs absolutely dreadful when it comes to Gleam, to the point that I most often disable even inline autocomplete when working in Gleam codebases. Too often I find the
71.
▲
by
jdiff
2mo ago
How many phones have you tested this with?
72.
▲
by
jdiff
2mo ago
Not trying to argue you out of your preference, but trying to understand it: Why would you want to be able to accidentally hide parts of the page by having a sidebar open, or extended too far? I don't understand why the page should pre
73.
▲
by
jdiff
2mo ago
According to a new uncle to your comment, not whois or RDAP.
74.
▲
by
jdiff
2mo ago
It's a grammatical error, sure, where is the indication of slop?
75.
▲
by
jdiff
2mo ago
Writing certainly reinforces more than that when you're not just starting out. It's a poor learning tool. When you have no grasp at all of the meaning, yes, it'll only enforce the syntax you can grasp at that point. I'll
76.
▲
by
jdiff
2mo ago
Writing reinforces. You won't learn from blind uncomprehending rewriting, sure, but when you already know the field, writing gives you the space to comprehend and digest. Certainly more than copying and pasting or blind acceptance of g
77.
▲
by
jdiff
2mo ago
At least one model can today. https://github.com/cactus-compute/cactus-hybrid
78.
▲
by
jdiff
2mo ago
They ignored the same copyright laws in many other cases. Why do we believe they were abiding strictly by it this time?
79.
▲
by
jdiff
2mo ago
No. The holy grail goes undiscovered for now.
80.
▲
by
jdiff
2mo ago
Embed text in an image, a human will read it just fine. Perfectly visible but opaque to AI. It'd be obnoxious to turn it into an attack, but you can replace letters with images in phrases so that humans read "she believed" wh
81.
▲
by
jdiff
2mo ago
If they're told to upload it as an opaque blob and only reference it by name, it may not react that way. So the attack may work, but it would also only last as long as you have billing limits left to feed it. It's not clear what w
82.
▲
by
jdiff
2mo ago
It is, but why? And what's with the bizarre way of phrasing that? Why the bizarre observation that, indeed, nobody asked for it?
83.
▲
by
jdiff
2mo ago
My gut says there are fewer people in that group than there are people who would've learned something who now decided learning something isn't worth the effort. A net loss.
84.
▲
by
jdiff
2mo ago
Do these hacks make bun less secure than other runtimes? I find it a little hard to believe you can get much more robust and performant than V8 or SpiderMonkey without cutting some corners that notably went uncut by either for all these yea
85.
▲
by
jdiff
2mo ago
All are quite large leaps.
86.
▲
by
jdiff
2mo ago
Where will this slope slide next? It doesn't seem all that slippery to me. First they came for the LLMs, Lord knows plenty of people are speaking up, but who will they come for next in the dead of night after a majority of voting membe
87.
▲
by
jdiff
2mo ago
If you were interested, check out Browsh. It's a similar project but based on Firefox and it's been around for quite some time now.
88.
▲
by
jdiff
2mo ago
Codeberg recently changed policy to not allow primarily AI-authored projects.
89.
▲
by
jdiff
2mo ago
My point is, these guardrails were implemented before the current admin ever intervened in Fable. They have the exact gangster mentality you describe. Many CEOs are lining up to kiss the ring, some literally offering gold bars, and we can s
90.
▲
by
jdiff
2mo ago
What kind of metaphor? You can be a metaphorical nanny state of something smaller like a household or comment section, I suppose, but even then not with a single statement. The problem with a nanny state is the scope. And people expressing
More ›