jdfr

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by jdfr 1y ago

   OP seems to have run a programming language detector on the generated texts, and made a graph of programming language frecuencies: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gx2kvNxXEAAkBO0.jpg?name=orig As a result, OP seems to thin
2. 2.▲
   by jdfr 6y ago

   The beginning of the text feels really odd, almost GPT-3-like at some points. At least, that's the way it seems when you do not know the jargon. It just rambles on and on. Thankfully it gets more coherent later on, but I am not sure wh
3. 3.▲
   by jdfr 10y ago

   This video (wanderers) does not give a reason, but it sums up quite nicely the way I feel it: https://youtu.be/YH3c1QZzRK4
4. 4.▲
   by jdfr 10y ago

   Whoa! Quite similar to the "magic" behind compressed sensing (as noted by the authors of the paper linked by the OP): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compressed_sensing Nice to see that similar mathematical too
5. 5.▲
   by jdfr 11y ago

   Vitter's algorithm is for when you need to generate a random list of unique items with sequential reads. If you drop that requirement, you can just use a substitution-permutation network: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki&#