jdasdf

25 ms·

241.
by jdasdf 5y ago
[Eliminating or severely reducing corporate taxation is a fairly mainstream idea in economics]( https://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/CorporateTaxation.html )
242.
by jdasdf 5y ago
This is exactly right. Corporate taxation is not a good thing in general, and makes everyone poorer.
243.
by jdasdf 5y ago
>From what I can tell it's all based on old-fashioned debunked economic theories in the same vain as "trickle-down-economy". Eliminating corporate tax is a fairly mainstream idea in economics, that is hamstrung by politics
244.
by jdasdf 5y ago
> I’d be happy to support local merchants, but they have to get the overall value proposition somewhat competitive. For the most part, they aren’t. Maybe it’s pricing, selection, policies, hours of operation, or some combination, but oth
245.
by jdasdf 5y ago
We both agree on the border there, see the treaty of vienna. The problem is that spain doesn't do what they agreed to do.
246.
by jdasdf 5y ago
Just a quick note here, selling puts is actually the worse of the examples you could have mentioned, because you can simply use it as a way to maintain an open order for the stock at a given price while getting paid for it. Selling calls wo
247.
by jdasdf 5y ago
> instead of fixing government policy and laws that disadvantage independent workers, You're mistaken. It is not independent workers that are disadvantaged, but employees who as a result of those laws are less attractive to hire. Th
248.
by jdasdf 5y ago
Its not about collective punishment. Universities sell reputation, both good and bad. It just so happens that they sold bad reputation.
249.
by jdasdf 5y ago
It makes perfect sense once you realize that universities are in the business of selling reputation. When someone graduates from the university, that is the same as the university saying "This person is up to our standards in terms of
250.
by jdasdf 6y ago
>What's wrong with that? ...The high housing prices.
251.
by jdasdf 6y ago
Offloading the problem solving to courts doesn't fix the issue, it just removes your involvement.
252.
by jdasdf 6y ago
Why do they have to curb anything?
253.
by jdasdf 6y ago
Except i'm not. I'm stating that whatever regulations the EU could have made didn't have to involve banning anything, or indeed taking any power whatsoever from the national governments. If the purpose was to facilitate trade
254.
by jdasdf 6y ago
Except you could enable trade without banning curvy bananas. All they had to do was standardize a rating system for bananas, and then countries could chose to ban whichever ratings they liked. Its a clear system that allows and enables trad
255.
by jdasdf 6y ago
Rule C is about indirect damages. The iminent danger i refered to is rule A: >RULE A1.There is a general average act when, and only when, any extraordinary sacrifice or expenditure is intentionally and reasonably made or incurred for the
256.
by jdasdf 6y ago
A general average requires an imminent danger which the ship is clearly no in, since it's just stuck. You also can't argue that they have to dump it overboard because of the costs that the delays will cause, because such costs are
257.
by jdasdf 6y ago
> Once a union has been certified or recognized, the employer is required to bargain over your terms and conditions of employment with your union representative. Oh. So once again bad laws cause the whole problem...
258.
by jdasdf 6y ago
I don't get it, why do workers need to vote in order to start/join a union? Why would the company care if they do join a union? Can't they simply refuse to negotiate with the union?