Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
jdasdf
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
61.
▲
by
jdasdf
2y ago
Can you show me where the EU disclose its compaign financing for the romanian presidential election? They've certainly been putting the finger down in the scales far more than the russians
62.
▲
by
jdasdf
2y ago
There is only one reason why insurance straight up isn't available somewhere, and the reason is regulation. I can assure you that no matter how high the risk of fire, insurers will be willing to provide insurance on that so long as the
63.
▲
by
jdasdf
2y ago
Yes it is, but big company bad so no one cares to look at themselves to see the true problem. This could be solved today by not imposing arbitrary restrictions on what other people can do with their land without their consent.
64.
▲
by
jdasdf
2y ago
How you get over the login barriers for youtube?
65.
▲
by
jdasdf
2y ago
>A large amount of those people are very young, at an age where you don't really pick your options solely on their super long term consequences. And they will continue to be if there are never any consequences. Stop bailing people o
66.
▲
by
jdasdf
2y ago
They shouldn't.
67.
▲
by
jdasdf
2y ago
>Sometimes vagueness is a necessary lubricant to get enough agreement on something, but I take your point. Seems to me that a vague law is simply an invalid law. The rule of law requires the clear knowledge of what exactly is illegal, if
68.
▲
by
jdasdf
2y ago
This. Anyone that voted for a law that is later struck down committed an illegal act, and should be liable for it.
69.
▲
by
jdasdf
2y ago
>Meaning we'd be able to enforce the law much more effectively. There is no technical or practical barrier to enforcement of most relevant laws. The primary barrier for such enforcement is the same that causes some many and so vague
70.
▲
by
jdasdf
3y ago
>The idea that you can't shut down your servers is just wrong. Personally i find the idea of deceptive advertising and breach of contract with no recourse to be wrong too. How about we meet in the middle? No one is forced to keep an
71.
▲
by
jdasdf
3y ago
This is not a "Pay or see ads" issue, this is a "pay or consent" issue. Facebook can show all the ads they like, and have a "pay to not see them" option too.
72.
▲
by
jdasdf
3y ago
>At least most of the German and French media industries do, and they've been getting away with doing the exact same pay-or-consent thing for years. And they are wrong there too. This is not a "Pay or see ads" issue, this
73.
▲
by
jdasdf
3y ago
>They set this war up so that there is as much civilian casualties as possible on their side to claim it's a genocide. Fairly certain Hamas wasn't the one who shoved 2.5 million people in a tiny location with no way out.
74.
▲
by
jdasdf
3y ago
>A company has to be over 250 employés to be GDPR compliant. That's not true.
75.
▲
by
jdasdf
3y ago
>what could be more pleasant than being able to criss-cross Europe in night trains that are affordable, comfortable and sustainable? Doing it by plane at a fraction of the time and cost.
76.
▲
by
jdasdf
3y ago
> What you're really saying is that employers should be allowed to form a large powerful collective organization but employees shouldn't. That's not what he said, but you'll ignore it anyway. If employees want to form
77.
▲
by
jdasdf
3y ago
As they should. If you're going to propagandize to kids, it's only right that the side you're opposing should be able to do the same.
78.
▲
by
jdasdf
3y ago
>Then its not the state [0], whatever it calls itself, in the same way that Emporer Norton, despite his claimed title, was not the head of state of the United States. Plenty of states didn't have law enforcement powers, including th
79.
▲
by
jdasdf
3y ago
>You're now changing your argument from urban-rural to D-R? This tells me you missed the argument i was making. The point isn't a specific urban-rural or Dem-Rep, it's the underlying concept of not having agency over what
80.
▲
by
jdasdf
3y ago
You're missing the point. Being enfranchised in driving the state is only important if the state has a significant impact in your life. The lower the impact (read, the power) of the state, the lower the need to be enfranchised. For you
81.
▲
by
jdasdf
3y ago
By looking at other similar countries that havent gone that far.
82.
▲
by
jdasdf
3y ago
Define oppression then. Because I fail to see any conceptual difference here.
83.
▲
by
jdasdf
3y ago
>Isn't this also the case of blue cities in red states? I believe e.g. there's a big hullabaloo in Virginia at the moment where the bluer school district close to DC is resisting anti-transgender top-down demands from the state
84.
▲
by
jdasdf
3y ago
I mean I gave an example in Oregon but you seem to have skipped it. If you'd like a more concrete example, how about we look at the effects that these minority/majority impacts have had on the delegates sent to the presidential co
85.
▲
by
jdasdf
3y ago
>Tired analogy that doesn't actually make any point. It does, but it seems you've missed. Let me make it clear as day. If there's a country with 3 people on it, where 2 of those people want to oppress the third, there is n
86.
▲
by
jdasdf
3y ago
>Rural areas do not "have no voice" - they have exactly the representative power of their population, the same as urban centers. I'm not sure what makes people in or from rural areas thinks that once people live close toge
87.
▲
by
jdasdf
3y ago
You can literally look at their annual reports on [EDGAR]( https://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch ) Alternatively you can do what I do and use an aggregator like Macrotrends that takes that data and put
88.
▲
by
jdasdf
3y ago
>I provide financial and logistical support to worker organizing efforts, so being familiar with this information is top of mind. It shows, given all the lies you've been spewing all over this thread. For example: >Profits at the
89.
▲
by
jdasdf
3y ago
>What positive return is guaranteed that makes these relationships beneficial? Why do you believe that guarantees are required? Or even that the return must be positive?
90.
▲
by
jdasdf
3y ago
> Maybe, but what's the point in not generating 7 dollars of economic activity for every dollar spent, inspiring millions, and bootstrapping the process? Because not spending that dollar on putting a guy on the moon could have gener
More ›