jcmfernandes

6 ms·

31.
by jcmfernandes 1y ago
You misspelled accountable.
32.
by jcmfernandes 1y ago
Do you want to debate or continue with the gaslighting?
33.
by jcmfernandes 1y ago
Copyright? WTF are you talking about? Who's talking about copyright? Did or didn't RC perform a hostile takeover of the repos?
34.
by jcmfernandes 1y ago
I find your obsession over Andre's fault and disdain towards the stealing of the repos by RC amusing. And you know what? I think you're right! What Andre did could constitute a crime. Any serious organization would lawyer up and g
35.
by jcmfernandes 1y ago
I'm questioning why they didn't call him. Why? And why are you ignoring that RC did a hostile takeover of the repos? Again, RC stole the repos. What do you think of that?
36.
by jcmfernandes 1y ago
Arko explained why he changed the password. Yes, he should have communicated the change, and that's on him. I still can't understand why RC preferred to publish a hit piece on him instead of... calling him to ask if he had changed
37.
by jcmfernandes 1y ago
> It doesn't matter why you break into your former employer's server. Arko already stated that he didn't know he had been fired. Geez. > You know Arko didn't even start working on Rubygems until it was nearly 10 ye
38.
by jcmfernandes 1y ago
Yes, and he already explained why he did it. Yes, he should have communicated it clearly. That's on him. At the same time, why didn't RC call him to ask? Was it easier to write about a security INCIDENT throwing shade at Arko? Wit
39.
by jcmfernandes 1y ago
He ran the idea by a group of people, nothing more. We can disagree with it — so did RC — but that was it: bouncing an idea.
40.
by jcmfernandes 1y ago
He stated that he didn't know he had been terminated. RC admitted that no harm had been done. Yes, he should have communicated changing the password.
41.
by jcmfernandes 1y ago
Arko explained why he changed the password; I agree that he should have communicated the change. Now, does that justify the hostile takeover of the projects? C'mon... folks, there was a hostile takeover of two projects. Will we, as a c
42.
by jcmfernandes 1y ago
Loved the... argument?
43.
by jcmfernandes 1y ago
Let's say all of that is true. Did or didn't RC perform a hostile takeover of the repos?
44.
by jcmfernandes 1y ago
What wasn't factual in Joel's comment?
45.
by jcmfernandes 1y ago
I don't understand why the move wasn't undone. This is essentially kicking the can down the road.
46.
by jcmfernandes 1y ago
By not addressing HOW the project ended up in RC's hands, Matz is effectively whitewashing the move.
47.
by jcmfernandes 1y ago
It's widely known - there are podcasts focusing on this - that Contributed Systems LLC is a one-man show.
48.
by jcmfernandes 1y ago
An individual decided to stop donating 250k to an organization because he felt strongly about actions taken by the organization. How is this offensive?
49.
by jcmfernandes 1y ago
Where to start... DHH created Rails, but he didn't write Rails - a large community did. This is an attempt to be factual. Linus created Linux, but he didn't write Linux. Etc. Criticizing an *individual* for stopping to *donate* is
50.
by jcmfernandes 1y ago
Exactly. While it seems like the overarching goals were well-suited, the process was... WTF.
51.
by jcmfernandes 1y ago
+1. I agree with George when he says that AI is many times being used as a replacement for poor tooling, but you know what? So be it.
52.
by jcmfernandes 1y ago
Same here in Portugal. My parents were in their early-to-mid 20s when the dictatorship ended here, and my mom speaks fondly of our dictator Salazar. She lost 2 out of 12 brothers and sisters — 3 months and 4 years old, respectively — to per
53.
by jcmfernandes 1y ago
It's nice, and there's an emacs mode for it: https://github.com/JasZhe/hurl-mode
54.
by jcmfernandes 1y ago
The pope, as all humans, is fallible. It's only when speaks ex cathedra that his teachings are considered infallible. These are very rare (Francis never did it). Now, I agree with you. As a Catholic, I'll support any pope, i.e.,
55.
by jcmfernandes 1y ago
> An activity must encapsulate something much higher level than a single IO operation. So something like "Configure BGP on a router", "Start a VM" etc. It needs to be able to handle retries and thus be idempotent. I w
56.
by jcmfernandes 1y ago
I understand what you mean by being able to fully sandbox things and guarantee determinism, a must for the workflows and not the activities (using temporal lingo). When you say that the runtime handles, for example, retries, doesn't th
57.
by jcmfernandes 1y ago
Somewhat similar to Golem - https://github.com/golemcloud/golem - correct? So, I like this idea, I really do. At the same time, in the short-term, WASM is relatively messy and, in my opinion, immature (as an ecosystem)
58.
by jcmfernandes 2y ago
I thought the same while reading it and... I felt old.
59.
by jcmfernandes 2y ago
Insane effort. This sounded like a pipe dream just a couple of years ago. Congrats to everyone involved, especially to those who drove the effort.
60.
by jcmfernandes 2y ago
Cool stuff! What's your current focus on, and what are your plans for the near future? And congrats on the jump. It takes courage to go solo :)

More ›