11 ms·

What wasn't factual in Joel's comment?

• claudiug 1y ago
  it paints all the stuff like is one person fault. omits to tell like stuff like - gem.coop -> the person behind have a new tool rv that want to sell it - they want to sell the rubygems logs to corporatins - change the root pass at aws once they where remove from the project small details like this.
  • Mystery-Machine 1y ago
    Oh, I didn't know that André wants to sell gem.coop and/or rv. Can you please point me to more info about where this intention to sell gem.coop and/or rv was mentioned? They want to sell some RubyGems logs about corporations (not individuals) using RubyGems API, to...Ruby Central? As André explained on his site, he was on-call at the time when they were removing him. He acted to protect the service by limiting access. No harmful actions done by him were ever discovered by Ruby Central. It's two entities fighting to remove the other. You can say Ruby Central was right, I can say André was right. But we do know that Ruby Central fired the first shot when they (could've been an actual hacker) removed literally everyone from RubyGems and Bundler projects.
  • jcmfernandes 1y ago
    Let's say all of that is true. Did or didn't RC perform a hostile takeover of the repos?
  • jaredcwhite 1y ago
    you're leaving out copious amounts of context here so sounds like you are obfuscating on purpose.