Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
jbk
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
12 ms
·
91.
▲
by
jbk
4y ago
No, we don’t.
92.
▲
by
jbk
4y ago
Wayyy tooo late for that.
93.
▲
by
jbk
4y ago
lol. I actually checked with them :)
94.
▲
by
jbk
4y ago
None whatsoever.
95.
▲
by
jbk
4y ago
No, should we?
96.
▲
by
jbk
4y ago
> maybe https://pgportal.gov.in should help? File your grievance with the section of the government you want to complain to - in this case, I'd guess that's the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology. I
97.
▲
by
jbk
4y ago
It does
98.
▲
by
jbk
4y ago
Incorrect, Cicada deployed a custom version of VLC which was hacked. Use VLC from our website and you’ll be safe.
99.
▲
by
jbk
4y ago
> It is developed by VideoLAN, a Paris-based firm. Non-profit, not firm.
100.
▲
by
jbk
4y ago
> That surprised me because I thought VideoLAN was and is French. It is a French non-profit whose address is my parents place :)
101.
▲
by
jbk
4y ago
President of VideoLAN here: we got banned since a few months, and we don’t know why. (According to my stats, it is since the 13 February 2022) . We’ve asked the Indian government and we got no answer. We probably did not ask the right plac
102.
▲
by
jbk
4y ago
PS and SBR notably.
103.
▲
by
jbk
5y ago
> This reads to me as it being a PITA to maintain. Not more than any other language: when it's well done, it's manageable. When it's spaghetti code, it's not manageable.
104.
▲
by
jbk
5y ago
As all software decoders… So you compare software to hardware decoders? H265 or VP9 in software are the same… Here, we managed to have a sw decoder for a format that is one order of magnitude more complex than those codecs and yet, consume
105.
▲
by
jbk
5y ago
All arch have the same level of optimizations, but AVX2 might have a couple functions more. AVX-512 is still behind… Hand written with some macros, notably for the x86 mess (windows calling convention, ssse being 32 and 64b).
106.
▲
by
jbk
5y ago
And those machine cannot decode H265 in software… Sorry but you cannot say dav1d software decoding is bad on phones because some hardware from 15 years ago who can barely decode H264 cannot decode it.
107.
▲
by
jbk
5y ago
I really can't see how you read anything else that "it's very optimized" in my message, tbh.
108.
▲
by
jbk
5y ago
Tbh, those results are a bit surprising. We have much better results with similar hardware... How are you testing? Is that dav1d 1.0? 8bit or 10bit content? If you tested before 1.0 and 10bit content, you should run it again, since we pushe
109.
▲
by
jbk
5y ago
> older Core 2 Duo MacBook Pro Core 2 Duo are processors from 16 years ago... Mobile phones are more powerful than those machines...
110.
▲
by
jbk
5y ago
(President of VideoLAN here) What you should really look at on dav1d is the fact that the code has now around 186 kLoC of hand-written assembly in .S and .asm files… I think this is quite a feat (this is more asm than the whole FFmpeg) and
111.
▲
by
jbk
5y ago
Something like that: http://www.jbkempf.com/blog/post/2022/FFmpeg-5.0
112.
▲
FFmpeg 5.0 “Lorentz” Release
(ffmpeg.org)
4 points
by
jbk
5y ago
|
0 comments
113.
▲
by
jbk
5y ago
And very few of those big companies contribute back… See https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29524103
114.
▲
by
jbk
5y ago
DirectX 12 API is a pretty small case to throw all the project to trash. Notably since DirectX headers are always a different case compared to the rest of the Windows SDK
115.
▲
by
jbk
5y ago
That’s the opposite of our experience on VLC and Firefox was sharing our opinion: mingw-w64 people are skilled, nice and very clever and think about all use cases. This is how we are able to support configurations that even MS does not supp
116.
▲
by
jbk
5y ago
> What's the largest company that uses FFmpeg and has refused? What did they say? I won't give names, but some very large cloud providers and some very large chips vendors.
117.
▲
by
jbk
5y ago
> It essentially talks about a services and support business around open source. Which is _exactly_ what we are doing...
118.
▲
by
jbk
5y ago
> Would following an open core model work better, like it has for Hashicorp, Sidekiq, Tailwind, etc? Yes, I think this might be a better model, indeed. But I did not start either of those projects, I came on board later; and those models
119.
▲
by
jbk
5y ago
> You need a proper "asshole" in such organizations that will go and threaten complete lack of support if the bill isn't paid. That's the point, they don't pay, and they don't get support. But they still com
120.
▲
by
jbk
5y ago
> Given this situation, why will they pay for what they can get for free? See the article...
More ›