jbeja

13 ms·

61.
by jbeja 12y ago
Well JS is all about context, literally and figuratively I guess.
62.
by jbeja 12y ago
Using "this" is already an anti-pattern.
63.
by jbeja 12y ago
Ironically: http://ckknight.github.io/gorillascript/
64.
by jbeja 12y ago
I find funny what you find "mind blowing".
65.
by jbeja 12y ago
Use she to express it as person when I don't know the gender.
66.
by jbeja 12y ago
Those don't represent the rest.
67.
by jbeja 12y ago
Don't follow you and your logic at all nor understand how you came with it.
68.
by jbeja 12y ago
She can't, given how little experience she have with the language.
69.
by jbeja 12y ago
Because?
70.
by jbeja 12y ago
Which language do you use this days?
71.
by jbeja 12y ago
"I have a moderate experience with Lisp, very little experience with Haskell and these days mostly program in Java, Julia and Python" I despise that people give their 2 cents for something they haven't experienced much.
72.
by jbeja 12y ago
Maybe relevant: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SrKj4hYic5A
73.
by jbeja 12y ago
jQuery and Javascript Promises comes to mind, I know they started in C++ put they are practically Monads.
74.
by jbeja 12y ago
I heard sometime ago that given that Elm is build around FRP, is not very good for making widgets or reusable and nested components. Why would this be the case?
75.
by jbeja 12y ago
You would have to think of it in a higher context. This slides could be very insightful for your question about type union and how they are very useful: http://fsharpforfunandprofit.com/ddd
76.
by jbeja 12y ago
Sorry for asking this but, what people mean with "Internet of Things"?
77.
by jbeja 12y ago
You don't need a framework to enforce architecture, people have been doing this for ages just using Types and Domain Driven Design.
78.
by jbeja 12y ago
I care as much for Android 2.x as ie below 10.
79.
by jbeja 12y ago
You don't need jQuery if you don't care about ie-9 (which I don't)
80.
by jbeja 12y ago
Actually since forever, you don't need to use document.getElementById("x") in any case. You just by putting the id to the element, it is already available to you referencing it by such id. So this: document.getElementBy
81.
by jbeja 12y ago
As Intellij community edition.
82.
by jbeja 12y ago
Should I get this or just keep using Intellj?
83.
by jbeja 12y ago
Loving learning #F for educational purpose on my spare time and I am loving it, any idea of which is the market for this language or for what you should be use it?
84.
by jbeja 12y ago
Why not purescript?
85.
by jbeja 12y ago
I can't wait for .NET to be ported to Linux to try this, it looks awesome.
86.
by jbeja 12y ago
Indeed, New-Agnostic Constructor Pattern, is the simpliest patter if you want to avoid the new keyword: function User (name, lastname) { if (!(this instanceof User)) { return new User(name, lastname); } this.
87.
by jbeja 12y ago
I am so happy for this actualy and I hope that this promote others developers to completely drop support for IE8.
88.
by jbeja 12y ago
Which country are you guys?
89.
by jbeja 12y ago
Not to mention, FD UI is more performant than anything else.
90.
by jbeja 12y ago
If only people realise that Flat UI is more performant in mobile

More ›