jazarwil

4 ms·

1.
by jazarwil 9mo ago
I'd love to run more games, just very expensive unfortunately.
2.
by jazarwil 9mo ago
Wdym exactly? I ran 163 games, are you suggesting more games or something else?
3.
by jazarwil 9mo ago
There are a few reasons that come to mind, such as winning larger pots on average, and also playing more hands by virtue of not getting knocked out as frequently.
4.
by jazarwil 9mo ago
Oh to be clear, there are ~21k hands here, and far more decisions than that.
5.
by jazarwil 9mo ago
I didn't incorporate any open weights/source models just to limit the number of API providers I had to juggle, but it is just a config change if somebody wants to try a run with them.
6.
by jazarwil 9mo ago
Not at the moment, do you have something in mind?
7.
by jazarwil 9mo ago
I've seen some theories tossed around but I don't think I'm qualified to offer an authoritative answer. Gemini 3 Pro specifically seems to be consistently "tighter" and more passive than Flash.
8.
by jazarwil 9mo ago
It greatly depends on the models. The 6-handed setup with Opus and Pro cost about $30/game. The 4-handed setup with just small models was $6/game. I'd love to run more but I already spent quite a bit as it is.
9.
Show HN: Watch LLMs play 21,000 hands of Poker(pokerbench.adfontes.io)
36 points by jazarwil 9mo ago|19 comments
10.
by jazarwil 3y ago
You cannot compare GPT 4 to Gemini Pro. They are different classes of models.
11.
by jazarwil 3y ago
What exactly do you think you saw? Bard is not trained on any data of that nature, unless it is already publicly available.