jaywalk

45 ms·

571.
by jaywalk 4y ago
Lockheed Martin just doesn't want to be in the "video game" business. They'll still gladly take your money, though.
572.
by jaywalk 4y ago
Well, the country that dropped the first two just so happened to be the only country that had them in the first place. So that's entirely irrelevant.
573.
by jaywalk 4y ago
It's a shame that it will probably take many people getting caught up in this law over multiple years before it's thrown out as blatantly unconstitutional.
574.
by jaywalk 4y ago
Unnecessarily stopping at a floor for a few seconds is minor to literally everyone riding in a public elevator. But yeah, I'm sure that at all of the various elevator companies, over all of the years that elevators have had electronic
575.
by jaywalk 4y ago
I stayed at a hotel that used this. It's a very nice, efficient system. Much better than everybody cramming into the next elevator that arrives and selecting a bunch of floors.
576.
by jaywalk 4y ago
Not worth complicating the UX to address such a minor issue.
577.
by jaywalk 4y ago
Probably Acrobat.
578.
by jaywalk 4y ago
Call it whatever you want, but the fact remains that the vast majority of gun killings are done with handguns. Yes, you can point to certain events (like Las Vegas) that would only be possible with a rifle, but it still doesn't chang
579.
by jaywalk 4y ago
I don't even know what "ability to spray bullets in front of several people" means, but the Las Vegas massacre didn't happen in a school or grocery store so it's entirely irrelevant to the point I was making.
580.
by jaywalk 4y ago
Access to weapons in the US is tighter than it ever has been. This stuff wasn't happening in the 50s-70s when mail-order catalogs sold rifles with zero background checks, and kids routinely brought them to school.
581.
by jaywalk 4y ago
Our "barbaric policies" do not allow Canadian citizens to purchase firearms. So it's already guaranteed that US laws have been broken.
582.
by jaywalk 4y ago
The vast majority of shootings are done with handguns. There is nothing specific to semi-automatic rifles that make them deadlier in a school or grocery store.
583.
by jaywalk 4y ago
Apple would have to be complicit. And at that point, why tie it to an app that almost nobody will download? Just build it into iOS/iCloud and call it a day.
584.
by jaywalk 4y ago
All of the ones I've seen specifically say "RECORDING IN PROGRESS" on the screen. Could they be lying? Sure, but I doubt they are.
585.
by jaywalk 4y ago
Nope, they will not get to keep their App Store restrictions. From the DMA Q&A page ( https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/QANDA_... ): > Ban on requiring app developers to use cert
586.
by jaywalk 4y ago
I can imagine that anybody who even thinks about it gets a visit from some anonymous men in suits who set them straight.
587.
by jaywalk 4y ago
If that was the case, then it's been an abject failure. China owns Africa.
588.
by jaywalk 4y ago
This company was explicitly sanctioned, which means American companies are not allowed to do business with them. So yes, it's really a complaint. Sure we can't catch everything, but we can at least stop the obvious stuff like this
589.
by jaywalk 4y ago
> What case was brought before the court before they made this ruling? West Virginia vs. EPA was the case this ruling was made on. The article is whining because the regulation that West Virginia sued the EPA over was already pulled back
590.
by jaywalk 4y ago
The press release is pretty poorly-written, but it sounds like today's been the deadline for (at least) a year.
591.
by jaywalk 4y ago
> You honestly think it's a good system to have congress be the ones legislating on every new way companies come up with to pollute? Absolutely not, and nobody (including SCOTUS in their ruling) says that they have to. Congress can
592.
by jaywalk 4y ago
Is that data actually tracked and available publicly?
593.
by jaywalk 4y ago
A state isn't supposed to do any of that on it's own. Congress is supposed to pass laws regarding those sorts of things, not just create an agency in the Executive branch and let it run wild.
594.
by jaywalk 4y ago
So we should just ignore the Constitution because our elected representatives, who we can actually kick out of office, don't want to do their jobs?
595.
by jaywalk 4y ago
Why would you assume that the fact that someone is a programmer indicates to you anything at all about literally any other aspect of their life or views? It seems to me that you just built up your own little fantasy world, and are shocked t
596.
by jaywalk 4y ago
The court can't just overturn laws. Cases have to be brought to them first. So your argument of "why is X bad law allowed to stand when they just overturned Y?" doesn't hold water.
597.
by jaywalk 4y ago
You're looking at it completely backwards. Congress was fine to let the EPA run around and do whatever, because that means people can bitch at the EPA instead of Congress. > Why is it the court's job to tell congress what they
598.
by jaywalk 4y ago
That would be Coinbase user data. It's definitely not on the blockchain.
599.
by jaywalk 4y ago
Shure SE215 and the default tip it comes with. I can only speculate on why the IEM is better, but I suspect it comes down to the tip material creating a better, more substantial seal. The outer shell is also physically larger, and that may
600.
by jaywalk 4y ago
My imagination can get pretty wild, but I can't even begin to imagine how they could do that without severely bending the definitions of "Coinbase user data" and "public sources" to the point of breaking.

More ›