jayd16

50 ms·

361.
by jayd16 6mo ago
It's more about how random bits and blurbs from every school are used to suit the politics of the day.
362.
by jayd16 6mo ago
> Who says they're not advocating? They did. > I don't like it, but can't do much about it. They're out of ideas. Quitting is an idea. There are plenty of other things to do but if they're not going to bothe
363.
by jayd16 6mo ago
A MIME type for every genre.
364.
by jayd16 6mo ago
If they can scrape and fine, they can just make a list and the browser can use that.
365.
by jayd16 6mo ago
But they're not advocating. They're claiming they can do nothing. Quitting in protest would be more advocation.
366.
by jayd16 6mo ago
Then it's a discussion about magnitude and jumping to starvation is unfounded.
367.
by jayd16 6mo ago
So anything that effects food prices, regardless of magnitude, causes mass starvation?
368.
by jayd16 6mo ago
Lets just base benchmarks on bounty rankings. To bench a model, you have it look at PRs on some open source projects. It has to complete a novel task or improve a previous task but no points for just re-doing a task with an existing PR.
369.
by jayd16 6mo ago
Can you still curl the chrome installer and run it as a user without elevated permissions? Seems a lot faster.
370.
by jayd16 6mo ago
If your plane fails to fly and humans can't fly then we should be looking at the musculature of humans when working on the plane?
371.
by jayd16 6mo ago
It is non-sensical because you're simply bringing in comparisons without anything linking the two. You might as well be talking about how oranges, and bicycles think as well as that is just as relevant as how humans think in this disc
372.
by jayd16 6mo ago
I mean... Just take a source photo and over paint it? Splats don't really get you closer to a workable model than concept art.
373.
by jayd16 6mo ago
You might as well be asking a tape recorder why it said something. Why are we confusing the situation with non-nonsensical comparisons? There is no internal monologue with which to have introspection (beyond what the AI companies choose to
374.
by jayd16 6mo ago
Well I think the story is that they didn't ask it or trust it. They were caught by its ability to fuck up everything because a key was in the codebase.
375.
by jayd16 6mo ago
Beyond that, isn't it just going to make up a narrative to fit what's in the prompt and context? I don't think there's any special introspection that can be done even from a mechanical sense, is there? That is to say, a
376.
by jayd16 6mo ago
> This is the agent on the record, in writing Yeah... it doesn't work that way.
377.
by jayd16 6mo ago
The site/group is Feminist Hacking. They happen to do a fun project and put it up. That idea that you think these things are unnatural or an odd match is probably why it's a good idea they did it. If it was a bee keeper group tal
378.
by jayd16 6mo ago
They get their sequential trap example wrong. You can call async methods without immediately calling await. You can naively await as late as possible. They'll run in parallel, or at least how ever the call was configured.
379.
by jayd16 6mo ago
ZIRP and Moore have helped the cloud build up with a promise of profits and ever increasing performance. The future is likely different. "Power will be cheap" is hope you can hang any hat on. We've been increasing compute pe
380.
by jayd16 6mo ago
Maybe they only ever get Samsung devices. Dex is almost a decade old. A desktop mode was recently added for base Android tho. And you could always mod your Android device to open termux when you connected an external monitor, that sort of
381.
by jayd16 6mo ago
Just like how cloud costs got cheaper and we solved the datacenter/energy problem over the past 10 years.
382.
by jayd16 6mo ago
And they didn't come to the same conclusion then. They changed their behavior, don't like the new behavior and are extrapolating that beyond the new behavior.
383.
by jayd16 6mo ago
The occasional cup where you can actively feel you don't like it, doesn't sound like a solid analogue to the steady state of daily consumption. I jog every day and enjoy vs I don't exercise but I occasionally sprint and I fee
384.
by jayd16 6mo ago
Nice web, Mr. Crack spider.
385.
by jayd16 6mo ago
That doesn't automate the maintenance of the hooks, doesn't handle cross branch differences, opens you up to all kinds of security holes because now it'll just do whatever the hook points to which is likely to be in the repo
386.
by jayd16 6mo ago
LFS hooks are not just a convenience, for example. CI, despite being a useful thing in its own right, is not a replacement.
387.
by jayd16 6mo ago
You're talking out of both sides of your face here. It's dangerous and also it's super easy and you should do it first thing without having to think because it's so easy. You shouldn't run this code but also the b
388.
by jayd16 6mo ago
Git is already a build tool and LFS is a great example of something git should be able to do and is also an example of how bolted on these things feel because of pointless push back in talking about a real solution. You don't need to b
389.
by jayd16 6mo ago
No there are a million miles in-between no support/Don't use it and arbitrary code execution. Signed git plugins and manifest or a canonical way to define hooks in repo that most tools can interface with and allow the user to auto
390.
by jayd16 6mo ago
This is very much not a serious solution. Look at the case of LFS. LFS needs an install step and it needed to be brought into git itself to cut through all of the problems. Manually managing hooks is not sufficient. No amount of "ple

More ›