4 ms·
It is non-sensical because you're simply bringing in comparisons without anything linking the two. You might as well be talking about how oranges, and bicycles
by jayd16 6mo ago
It is non-sensical because you're simply bringing in comparisons without anything linking the two. You might as well be talking about how oranges, and bicycles think as well as that is just as relevant as how humans think in this discussion.
In fact, talking about "thinking" at all is already the wrong direction to go down when trying to triage an incident like this. "Do not anthropomorphize the lawnmower" applies to AI as much as Larry Ellison.
- vidarh 6mo agoThe thing linking the two is that neither are able to accurately introspect and explain the actual reason why they made a decision. If thinking is the wrong direction to go down, then it is also the wrong direction to go down when talking about humans.
- jayd16 6mo agoIf your plane fails to fly and humans can't fly then we should be looking at the musculature of humans when working on the plane?