jawarner

13 ms·

121.
by jawarner 6y ago
People-as-cows, huh? What does that mean to you?
122.
by jawarner 6y ago
Are you on Twitter? It's a more common platform for political stuff. Facebook is for friends, and unless you want to discuss politics with all of your friends at once, why not just keep it to personal stuff?
123.
by jawarner 6y ago
Social cooling is not global warming. Yes, they are both "subtle and complex," as are all modern issues. The latter poses an existential threat to humankind and has already claimed the lives of many. The other is certainly a probl
124.
by jawarner 6y ago
Do you know if the hunter-nurture interpretation was introduced elsewhere? This article is a little light. It captures the imagination, but I don't see the evidence. Certainly there is a sex bias in object preference present in infants
125.
by jawarner 6y ago
The short videos are alongside the long-form content. They divert user attention if the long feature hits a lull. The investment of the short video is perceived to be lower, so users will stay in the app for longer.
126.
by jawarner 6y ago
Sorry, a GFoUS?
127.
by jawarner 6y ago
What do you think is the best way to accomplish this?
128.
by jawarner 6y ago
You may be interested in this implementation [1] which builds the networks using PyTorch. [1] https://github.com/uber-research/PyTorch-NEAT
129.
by jawarner 6y ago
As the network size increases, it can learn more complex functions. When the network gets bigger and bigger, it gets closer to being able to learn any arbitrary function.
130.
by jawarner 7y ago
I don't understand. The example you gave is not an algebraic function.
131.
by jawarner 7y ago
This could benefit from a discussion of when it is and when it isn't useful or practical to apply the technique described. It helps with serialization, and optimization in cases like deep learning frameworks. In other cases I think it
132.
by jawarner 7y ago
Using language is one of the team's future aims. I don't think it would be impossible, since outside of communication for reasoning / deduction purposes, every in-game action can be described in an obvious and unambiguous man
133.
by jawarner 7y ago
No, they extend the counterfactual regret minimization (CFR) algorithm, which is used to play poker, in order to play Avalon.
134.
by jawarner 7y ago
I liked Remarkable initially. But its development has stopped with bugs outstanding. One is that typing with live-preview enabled jumps the viewport to the top. Typora seems nicer.
135.
by jawarner 7y ago
The reward system was designed to be triggered, or exploited. The trick is saying what's good and what's bad stimulation.
136.
by jawarner 7y ago
Thank you for an interesting comment.
137.
by jawarner 7y ago
Land usage per chicken, difference between free-range vs. intensively reared: 1/12 m^2 vs. 1/17 m^2 Consumer cost, difference between free range vs. intensively reared: 4 euros/lb vs. 2 euros/lb. Does the difference in p
138.
by jawarner 7y ago
Do they know that their liberties are not the same as in the wild? More importantly, do you believe it causes the chickens psychological pain? I'm not convinced you're not making a naturalist fallacy. Can you point to what is wron
139.
by jawarner 8y ago
Interesting. So, for instance, you are aware that women did not have the fight to vote until 1920. Is your belief that women have never been marginalized? Or that they used to be, but in quantitative terms this group by now in 2018 has atta
140.
by jawarner 8y ago
It was also morally unfashionable to criticize liberating the slaves in the Northern states. So, thankfully, "moral fashion" presided in that case. In the Me Too social justice movement, for instance, Things You Can't Say com
141.
by jawarner 8y ago
No, in NEAT both the weights and topology are evolved. It is totally gradient-free.
142.
by jawarner 8y ago
That sounds like the brain atlas created with subjects listening to stories in an fMRI machine. Here's a Guardian article about it: https://www.theguardian.com/science/2016/apr/27/brain-atlas-... An
143.
by jawarner 8y ago
I'm having trouble visualizing this. One hand is on the pasta handle. Where is the other? What is your secret to no spilled spaghetti?
144.
by jawarner 8y ago
Of course they do. Our neurons generate conscious experience, and, assuming there's nothing superphysical about our own biology, it's natural to believe that all matter has conscious experience in some shape or form.
145.
by jawarner 8y ago
Are you against marketing in general? What's different about these advanced techniques? I see technology applied to marketing as a natural consequence of business. You have a point that it's not necessarily in the best interest of
146.
by jawarner 8y ago
I'm not quite convinced of the article's thesis. It may be true that the brain doesn't chug along on a background problem continuously for days, but instead it checks in on the problem every so often when it is in a different
147.
by jawarner 8y ago
Hint: The interior angles of any four sided shape add up to 360°.
148.
by jawarner 8y ago
Scientifically, weight would be the force of gravity on the object, not affected by buoyancy. So "weight" would be fine here. The legal definition might be different.
149.
by jawarner 9y ago
What why-question are you interested in?
150.
by jawarner 9y ago
This is neat, if you want to extend it there's a version of genetic algorithm for neural networks that tries out different connection settings and hidden layer sizes -- it's called NEAT.

More ›