Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
javajosh
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
78 ms
·
901.
▲
by
javajosh
4y ago
Are there any widely available, published threat models for secret management of this sort? It seems to me that if you want to frame the discussion in a useful way, you'd start there. Then you can point out where current practice works
902.
▲
by
javajosh
4y ago
>Math always seemed a bit arbitrary to me. That's because math is fundamentally arbitrary . This realization came to me late in life. Math was always presented as some aspect objective reality. However over time I've come to
903.
▲
by
javajosh
4y ago
This general approach is true within all Jewish traditions. For example, if you get sick on Shabbat you're allowed to drive to the hospital (and doctors are allowed to help you), or if you're ill during Rosh Hashana you don't
904.
▲
by
javajosh
4y ago
IMO this is even more outrageous than civil asset forfeiture. You get behind on property tax, the government balloons the debt 5x or 10x with fines, then they seize your home and sell it to pay the fines - and keep the profit! In one case m
905.
▲
Supreme Court to hear home equity theft case
(reason.com)
3 points
by
javajosh
4y ago
|
1 comments
906.
▲
by
javajosh
4y ago
>This is surprisingly honest for corporatespeak This reminds me of a cartoon that shows a field of sheep and a billboard with a wolf captioned "I will eat you", and one of the sheep says admiringly, "He really tells it l
907.
▲
by
javajosh
4y ago
Same, but one that doesn't assume python or an operating system.
908.
▲
by
javajosh
4y ago
My point is that "kill 'em" is exactly what we've already done to them, but we're too cowardly to admit it.
909.
▲
by
javajosh
4y ago
It's been over 20 years. Let 'em go or kill 'em, and close the base. And never do anything like this again. There is no best outcome, only least worst outcome, at this point. EDIT: and for the downvoters, you realize that if
910.
▲
by
javajosh
4y ago
Open-source is de facto closed source if you don't build your own stuff (and know how to debug it). That's the status most OSS users are in, I suspect. I run Linux but I've never compiled a kernel and I've never run a
911.
▲
by
javajosh
4y ago
>ECHELON AI is yawning Well, presumably it would stop yawning if you were, like, part of an armed rebellion. The perspective I'd like to hear would be the Ukranian civil and military resistance to Russia's invasion. How do t
912.
▲
by
javajosh
4y ago
Reputation isn't what it used to be. Which tech news org is willing to risk the wrath of LG, losing early access, losing invitations to events. Money can buy reputation, so as long as the revenue from ads exceeds the cost to repair rep
913.
▲
by
javajosh
4y ago
My wife and I were older than you both when we had two healthy kids. Don't beat yourself up. Correlation != causation. You won a bad lottery, a lottery that young parents 'win' too. Small comfort I know, but that's the t
914.
▲
by
javajosh
4y ago
Well, this law would be pretty bipartisan, I would think. Who likes it when their employer counter-party does these things? No-one. And as long as worker voters outnumber employers, workers can pass laws eliminating these degrees of freedo
915.
▲
by
javajosh
4y ago
I think that's a reasonable take, TBH. But for a moment consider the missed opportunity here. I'm about to be persona non grata, and its my final farewell. Am I going to limit myself to "Thanks"? No. I want to say some
916.
▲
by
javajosh
4y ago
Yes. My new Black Mirror script: AI's sockpuppeting dead salespeople, for profit! (note: I'm serious)
917.
▲
by
javajosh
4y ago
Now I'm thinking. As someone who's started businesses before and hired people - am I not empathizing enough with the employer? What would I do in this situation? I guess the answer to that is simple: first and foremost, I'd a
918.
▲
by
javajosh
4y ago
Agreed.
919.
▲
by
javajosh
4y ago
>Telling a lie or pretending to be someone is not a crime or illegal in civil law. It should be. Times have changed, and now it is possible to impersonate someone "perfectly". This has a negative impact on both the one being
920.
▲
by
javajosh
4y ago
I begin to see why capitalism works and also why it sucks . It works because it encourages people to find the crack into which they pour their intelligence, no matter how small. Capitalism is fractal in its complexity! Value is like a ve
921.
▲
by
javajosh
4y ago
You assume I'm ignorant and grumpy, though. My response to the ghost was simply to say that last post wasn't me, and I really was thankful to work with a great bunch of people. However, the possibility that an employer will post a
922.
▲
by
javajosh
4y ago
Holy shit. Who's the SaaS that does this and doesn't this run afoul of LinkIn's TOS???
923.
▲
by
javajosh
4y ago
Tell me, how would I even find out? If you're locked out of your account, how would you know who's posting as you, in general? Personally, I think there needs to be a hard limit on speaking as someone else. The company can say wha
924.
▲
by
javajosh
4y ago
I'm not so interested in damages - I suppose this shows my lack of legal training in the way I asked the question! TBH I find it intensely creepy and BAD that an employer might post as you under any circumstances. It feels like I
925.
▲
by
javajosh
4y ago
I'm in the US, working as a contractor (W-2 to the contractor, who I assume has something like a 1099 with the primary employer). The employer is in Madison, Wisconsin. I am in Florida. As for the contract, I think it's safe to as
926.
▲
Ask HN: Is it legal for an employer to post as you on Slack?
37 points
by
javajosh
4y ago
|
57 comments
927.
▲
by
javajosh
4y ago
DC's are paying $11k apiece for the A100 do ya think?
928.
▲
by
javajosh
4y ago
I also love Waffle House's food despite, maybe even because, it's 'bad'. Their waffles are legit good; the rest is coffee shop slop of the highest order. Recommended. (Glad Bourdain had the guts to say this)
929.
▲
by
javajosh
4y ago
Oh yes, I remember being inspired by the idea of reversible compute. That very much appeals to the physicist in me. But it was vague even back then, and resurfacing with this nonsense about needing a big team to make any progress tells me a
930.
▲
by
javajosh
4y ago
The lack of specifics about this technology plus the lack of communication led me to believe early on that it was not real. The notion that progress can only move forward with a large team, vs a small one, seems more like an argument you us
More ›