Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
jatone
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
24 ms
·
211.
▲
by
jatone
5y ago
have you thought about offloading that work to the distributions themselves? I'd be curious to see what say ubuntu would charge for them maintaining your packages for you. you just need to provide a tarball to them.
212.
▲
by
jatone
5y ago
and hes absolutely right. it needs to just work. WireGuard takes the same approach. And you're talking about the default ciphering setup golang in no way prevents you as a developer from changing ciphers as a developer of an applicatio
213.
▲
by
jatone
5y ago
neither, when pulseaudio was built there where problems all up and down the stack. from the kernel, alsa, and userspace. the effort around pulseaudio stabilized and resolved most of the problems in the kernel and alsa. leaving most of the p
214.
▲
by
jatone
5y ago
containers are actually a really good fit for dbs. they do one thing and one thing only and for a really really long time without many changes. and the answer is we will definitely be running DBs in clustered mode in the future. its not rea
215.
▲
by
jatone
5y ago
and how many of those former russians have family in russia.
216.
▲
by
jatone
5y ago
yup. resvg is the best atm i think.
217.
▲
by
jatone
5y ago
no its not.
218.
▲
by
jatone
5y ago
yes, ramdisks are great. =) I've used that approach to replace redis with a faster version on postgres. =)
219.
▲
by
jatone
5y ago
bytes, err := ioutil.ReadAll("path.txt") is the golang equivalent.
220.
▲
by
jatone
5y ago
if you add a suffix, you've changed the value. that is a mutation.
221.
▲
by
jatone
5y ago
its global state with a bunch of ceremony. outside of things like the user session and feature flags its essentially useless and more error prone than its worth.
222.
▲
by
jatone
5y ago
then feel free to build that tool on top of git. nothing is stopping you, given the existence of such tools today.
223.
▲
by
jatone
5y ago
no, its absolutely possible, as demonstrated by the numerous repositories that switched from cvs and svn to git. what you describe is a lack of desire to switch to another tool by your coworkers because you've been unable to make an ad
224.
▲
by
jatone
5y ago
tl;dr; a monkey is given a hammer and is baffled by utility. rofl. git is perfectly usable. proven by the hundreds of thousands of people using it daily. most of your 'complaints' here are not actually how git works in reality, an
225.
▲
by
jatone
5y ago
time I spend typing: 10%. time I spend thinking about how to optimize slow convoluted pythonic one liners: 60%. seriously people need to get over verbosity. its literally not an issue. problems usually arise from fucking condensed one liner
226.
▲
by
jatone
5y ago
the idea that append performs no mutation is fairly insane. its name implies a mutation.
227.
▲
by
jatone
5y ago
it is. dynamic linking is a mistake on today's desktops/laptop. disk is plentiful and most of a graphic programs space usage is in assets rather than the program.
228.
▲
by
jatone
5y ago
thankfully I believe I am a supreme being, so that isn't an issue!
229.
▲
by
jatone
5y ago
github TOS do not grant you use of others code. it grants distribution. those are two very different things.
230.
▲
by
jatone
5y ago
wow, absolutely not. if i'm parsing a programming language I want to basically stop and bail from the current context as soon as possible. there is basically nothing to gain by continuing. if the shit i'm parsing isn't in the
231.
▲
by
jatone
5y ago
you and I might not. but bugs happen. and sqlite being so permissive can aggravate the issue.
232.
▲
by
jatone
5y ago
the fact that is exactly what the writer did.... and they refused?
233.
▲
by
jatone
5y ago
depends on where the bottle necks in the research are. I doubt its man power. its most likely production of the various parts. generally speaking you don't get great returns on increasing the number of scientists. you do get great retu
234.
▲
by
jatone
5y ago
also mentioned chain reactions which would be one way to generate more energy than input even if your input was high.
235.
▲
by
jatone
5y ago
I honestly think we need to rethink accessibility from the ground up. modern advances in OCR and machine learning should allow us to do accessibility entirely from the GPU output. it'd take awhile to perfect but i think it'd ease
236.
▲
by
jatone
5y ago
dont forget global warming.
237.
▲
by
jatone
5y ago
limiting != simplicity. the majority of the arduino environment has literally nothing to do with the complexity of getting your program onto the device itself. you can have a very complex environment while still maintaining a very simple up
238.
▲
by
jatone
5y ago
the RPI picos are wonderful. what you described for a process of uploading the program to the hardware is what they should all be. anything more complicated than that is a no go for me these days.
239.
▲
by
jatone
5y ago
long as its truly indistinguishable price will win out. don't worry about it too much.
240.
▲
by
jatone
5y ago
> a few human laborers can do the same job with enormously less fuel cost. and this is where you're wrong. humans have to live in society. the cost isn't just food. you need to pay for housing, their electrical bills, water, fo
More ›