jannemann

4 ms·

1.
by jannemann 4y ago
https://youtu.be/0kahih8RT1k
2.
by jannemann 4y ago
Every energy source does require some sort of energy to make it possible to harvest it. And nuclear is no exception. We do not have any sustainable way to filter out enough carbon dioxide with any of the hypothetical excess energy. So sayi
3.
by jannemann 4y ago
> Nuclear power is considered a clean energy source because it has zero carbon dioxide emissions; This is flat out wrong. Containing, mining, recycling and long term storage are so extremely costly and energy hungry that it does not make
4.
by jannemann 7y ago
https://jitsi.org/
5.
by jannemann 7y ago
Interesting to see how people are bound to their selective perception if they can somehow profit from it. Ethos will squeeze every last drop out of this opportunity.
6.
by jannemann 7y ago
To reiterate the written words from the authors: Intel prevented this particular problem gets to the public and than they flat out lied to the customer.
7.
by jannemann 7y ago
I enjoyed the reading and think that it is not a technical article rather entertainment. Maybe that is wrong too and it is both. Why should every technical article by definition be written in a boring language? For technical details use the
8.
by jannemann 8y ago
The problem is you won't get an Data Processing Agreement (DPA) from them. And since email and names are sent through the service the DPA is mandatory. If someone somehow manages to detect your are sending his data to a non-compliant s
9.
by jannemann 8y ago
My favourite at the moment is sendwithus. They said their service will never be GDPR compliant. But fortunately they have a new "enterprise grade" product called sendwithus dyspatch. Same feature set, new price plus GDPR complianc
10.
by jannemann 10y ago
pfsense was forked a year or two ago, their 2.3 is just to keep up with the new kid on the block opnsense. And guess what, they have an API ;) https://opnsense.org/