Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
janice1999
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
31.
▲
by
janice1999
6mo ago
They invested billions. They're scared.
32.
▲
by
janice1999
6mo ago
Moved to Zed and recommended my team do the same.
33.
▲
by
janice1999
6mo ago
Asking talkie-1930 about whether communism could succeed in China is flagged as "potentially inappropriate." They use Qwen3Guard-Gen-4B from Alibaba for moderation.
34.
▲
by
janice1999
6mo ago
It does say lane "keeping" not lane "changing". I assume it's the safety feature to remain in the lane.
35.
▲
by
janice1999
6mo ago
I assume by lane keeping assistance they mean the more basic camera based system to warn and potentially correct drivers if they drift over a line without indicating. It makes sense it could also be geofenced to limit it to highways.
36.
▲
by
janice1999
6mo ago
They could store data and then dump it later when the vehicle is being serviced. Unless their privacy states otherwise, assume data is being gathered and sold. Other car manufactures have been caught selling travel data. It's not even
37.
▲
by
janice1999
6mo ago
Disabling internet connectivity disables lane keeping assistance. I wonder if this is a dark pattern to punish users who opt out or because they feel they need reports of crashes ahead to do it safely.
38.
▲
by
janice1999
6mo ago
And base the fines on the companies valuation, otherwise it'll just be written off as an operating expense. Normal fines and penalty points work as deterrents for everyday people, not multi-billion dollar companies. I also would not co
39.
▲
by
janice1999
6mo ago
Don't worry, I'm sure they'll find a way to blame the EU for this too.
40.
▲
by
janice1999
6mo ago
> the debacle of Biden’s $7.5B rollout of EV chargers that only managed to build a few dozen stations in 3 year You've fallen for disinformation. https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-electric-vehicle-charg...
41.
▲
by
janice1999
6mo ago
Two billion dollars of lobbying (i.e. bribery) by Facebook is the real answer. https://www.gadgetreview.com/reddit-user-uncovers-who-is-beh...
42.
▲
by
janice1999
6mo ago
There are plenty of non-profit software projects headquartered in Berlin, e.g. KDE since 1997, and they seem to do just fine.
43.
▲
by
janice1999
7mo ago
The best email I ever received was a notification my company was moving off Jira. Atlassian’s own stated philosophy is “Open Company, No Bullshit”. I wish that was true. Maybe they would have better products.
44.
▲
by
janice1999
7mo ago
The DSA covers App stores with a large numbers of users - this is about allowing users side load unsigned apps. Afaik there is no requirement to identify the developers of applications that can be installed on a vendors platform (outside th
45.
▲
by
janice1999
7mo ago
They already announced it. Here they only mention the special case where it does not apply: > In addition to the advanced flow we’re building free, limited distribution accounts for students and hobbyists. This allows you to share apps w
46.
▲
by
janice1999
7mo ago
Developers, including non-US citizens, are forced to give Google their government ID to distribute apps. This enables Google to track and censor projects, like NewPipe, an alternative open source Youtube frontend, by revoking signing permis
47.
▲
by
janice1999
7mo ago
What's the actual install size for a working example? Like similar "tiny" projects, do these models actually require installing 1GB+ of dependencies?
48.
▲
by
janice1999
7mo ago
The apps might not be available though. Many developers are simply stopping in the face of Google's invasive policies. I don't blame them. Say goodbye to useful apps like Newpipe.
49.
▲
by
janice1999
7mo ago
The forced ID for developers outside the Play store is already killing open source projects you could get on F-Droid. The EU really needs to identify this platform gatekeeping as a threat. As an EU citizen I should not be forced to give gov
50.
▲
by
janice1999
7mo ago
The 2nd rule is clearly intended to be a shield and distraction. It's there to pretend the law serves the public, when in reality it's designed to defend datacenter builders from the public interest. Politicians can talk about me
51.
▲
by
janice1999
8mo ago
> ...exploitative practices of the silicon valley elite have gone mainstream and will hopefully course correct the industry in time. I have little hope that is true. Don't expect privacy laws and boycott campaigns. That very same el
52.
▲
by
janice1999
8mo ago
The problem is that the effort required to understand the quality of a project has also gone through the roof (and not just due to the number of them). Good looking READMEs and docs, large test suites, well constructed code - LLMs can gener
53.
▲
by
janice1999
8mo ago
From a European perspective this response and your other comments ranting about "pronouns" and "Marxist ideology" makes me think you're either a troll parroting bizarre US political memes or, if serious, you're
54.
▲
by
janice1999
8mo ago
Intent matters though. Malicious actors, who are very much in power, will use the information to target universities and ideas [1] they don't like. Don't build databases for your enemies. Censuses were a great tool too, until cert
55.
▲
by
janice1999
8mo ago
US wind farms are 30 miles from the coast at most? No country is attacking that under some plausible deniability and it not being seen as an act of war.There are more important power lines further from civilisation running through rural are
56.
▲
by
janice1999
9mo ago
> Do data centers in space actually make sense? No. It's currently a fantasy. Even if the cost of getting payloads to orbit decreased another x100, you still have the issues of radiation and heat dissipation.
57.
▲
by
janice1999
9mo ago
Data centers don't create local jobs once construction is complete. 40 people, most remote, can run a data center. The F-35 program claims to have over 250,000 people employed in its supply chain in the US and has large factories with
58.
▲
by
janice1999
9mo ago
“We’re going to have supervision,” Oracle founder Larry Ellison said. “Every police officer is going to be supervised at all times, and if there’s a problem, AI will report that problem and report it to the appropriate person. Citizens wil
59.
▲
by
janice1999
9mo ago
If you're processing people's data it doesn't matter if it's free or not, you need to understand your legal obligations. You can't have a blank Terms of Service. You should really talk to a legal professional.
60.
▲
by
janice1999
9mo ago
You want companies to pay you to process their customers voices and private data, but I don't see a privacy policy or even what jurisdiction you operate in. Your Terms and Conditions is literally a placeholder. That's a huge red f
More ›