jamesyeldritch

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by jamesyeldritch 4y ago

   The issue is that the TOS has ridiculous, absurd requirements while granting the author of the software no actual, real-world benefit. And that the software can no longer be considered FOSS when it easily could have been. It's like wri
2. 2.▲
   by jamesyeldritch 4y ago

   It seems most likely the author's intent was to limit his own liability by including a vague TOS. What makes more sense is to provide the software strictly "AS-IS", without any guarantees, liabilities, warranty, or implied us
3. 3.▲
   by jamesyeldritch 4y ago

   The issue is that the TOS requires the user to not do anything "illegal". While on the surface this may seem an innocuous contract to agree to, in actuality this TOS pointlessly spits in the face of anyone living in a country wher
4. 4.▲
   by jamesyeldritch 4y ago

   Have a look into Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome to see if it rings any bells for you. (source: I am diagnosed with type 3 and can relate to many of the things in your story)