Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
jama211
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
16 ms
·
451.
▲
by
jama211
10mo ago
“The perps” gives away a huge flaw in your thinking, that people are inherently good or inherently bad and that “bad” people are motivated to do bad things always and will always find a way to do them and “good” people don’t. This is entire
452.
▲
by
jama211
10mo ago
A substack that tells you to “read Wikipedia” is not a valid criticism of the obvious.
453.
▲
by
jama211
10mo ago
You’re sealioning.
454.
▲
by
jama211
10mo ago
You haven’t tried shit, don’t lie to me. Most bad faith comment I’ve ever read in my life.
455.
▲
by
jama211
10mo ago
_sigh_ I didn’t say we shouldn’t.
456.
▲
by
jama211
10mo ago
Nice straw man, I argued for nothing that you are arguing against.
457.
▲
by
jama211
10mo ago
Hmm, someone being angry about AI on HN, this will do well given the folk here, but I doubt there’ll be much nuanced conversation in here.
458.
▲
by
jama211
10mo ago
It’s definitely providing some value but it’s incredibly overvalued. Much like the dot com bust didn’t mean that online websites were bad or useless technology, only that people over invested into a bubble.
459.
▲
by
jama211
10mo ago
They always did what they wanted with open source code, not sure why people think this is different
460.
▲
by
jama211
10mo ago
*in your opinion
461.
▲
by
jama211
10mo ago
Inside open source communities maybe. In the corporate world? Absolutely not. Ever. They will take your open source code and do what they want with it, always have.
462.
▲
by
jama211
10mo ago
Well said. AI makes people feel icky, that’s the actual problem. Everything else is post rationalisation they add because they already feel gross about it. Feeling icky about it isn’t necessarily invalid, but it’s important for us to unders
463.
▲
by
jama211
10mo ago
Except petrol is significantly cheaper than it was once you account for inflation.
464.
▲
by
jama211
10mo ago
I’m a senior developer and it has been hugely helpful for me in both saving time and effort and improving the quality of my output. You’re making a lot of confident statements and not backing them up with anything except your feelings on th
465.
▲
by
jama211
10mo ago
You’re attacking one or two examples mentioned in their comment, when we could step back and see that in reality you’re pushing against the general scientific consensus. Which you’re free to do, but I suspect an ideological motivation behin
466.
▲
by
jama211
10mo ago
That would be yes. What about a token return gift to another business that you actually hate the ceo of but have to send it anyway due to political reasons?
467.
▲
by
jama211
10mo ago
Well said, absolutely ridiculous framing keeps happening and you kept it grounded.
468.
▲
by
jama211
10mo ago
Whilst true, it’s important to focus on the worst ones first, as with everything there is a scale.
469.
▲
by
jama211
10mo ago
This should be higher, absolutely right
470.
▲
by
jama211
10mo ago
“We’ve tried nothing (about guns) and we’re all out of ideas” all over again.
471.
▲
by
jama211
10mo ago
I’m curious what the benefit of this is over running away, cursor ide with the Claude agent?
472.
▲
by
jama211
10mo ago
Oof, a whole CAT scanner is insane! Did insurance cover it?
473.
▲
by
jama211
10mo ago
Hmm, might need a few more cycles for that one
474.
▲
by
jama211
10mo ago
I can feel your pain in your comments, and when I was deep working for a company that treated me like crap I’d have been exactly the same way. I’m now in a company that treats me with great respect. No, I don’t have an actual stake in the c
475.
▲
by
jama211
10mo ago
Anything ending well on the internet is like a mythical unicorn though
476.
▲
by
jama211
10mo ago
You both make some good points
477.
▲
by
jama211
10mo ago
Not who you were just speaking with, but I’ve never agreed with the emotional side of a comment so much whilst disagreeing with the actionable choices side so much. In reality, the truth probably lies somewhere in the middle. I would draw t
478.
▲
by
jama211
10mo ago
List was to a time point, and list says 42. All good! You could even say after waiting the right amount of time, 42 was the answer this computer program generated…
479.
▲
by
jama211
10mo ago
Very well said. It worries me how quick people are to leap to “we’ll just imprison people that’ll help” despite endless data that says the opposite
480.
▲
by
jama211
10mo ago
So well said, I like the technique of taking their logic and turning it around, never seen that before but it’s smart.
More ›