jalaziz

4 ms·

1.
by jalaziz 2y ago
Great to know. I think the fear is that so many companies are prioritizing AI workloads for the valuation bump rather than delivering actual meaningful value.
2.
by jalaziz 2y ago
Check out this Dockerfile template if you're building Rust in Docker: https://depot.dev/docs/container-builds/how-to-guides/optima... What makes Depot so fast is that they use NVMe drives for local cachi
3.
by jalaziz 2y ago
I missed it too, but then found this: https://github.com/earthly/earthly/issues/4313
4.
by jalaziz 2y ago
GitHub Actions started off great as they were quickly iterating, but it very much seems that GitHub has taken its eye of the ball and the improvements have all but halted. It's really upsetting how little attention Actions is getting t
5.
by jalaziz 4y ago
We faced this at my last company and this is actually a super mild case. In our case, we were dealing with call toll fraud. We ended up with tens of thousands of dollars in charges in less than 24 hours. In our case, Twilio reached out to u
6.
by jalaziz 8y ago
This letter is clearly not written by someone who interacts with customers. As someone who has tried to work with Elastic, their pricing is atrocious even for the most basic of features. You can't get alerting without paying a king&#x2
7.
by jalaziz 9y ago
I saw that and I can't speak for HBO Now, but my experience with WatchESPN (which apparently also streams through BAMTech) has been abysmal. This may be incredibly naive of me, but I'd much rather have an independent tech powerhou
8.
by jalaziz 9y ago
I think this is a terrible idea, but time will tell. As a former Hulu employee, I can say that the media rights business is a mess. It took us (and Netflix) a very long time to convince media companies that the future is streaming. Now that
9.
by jalaziz 9y ago
Full disclosure, I work for Highfive. My coworkers and I are here and ready to answer any questions!
10.
How we stole some Chrome OS awesomeness long before Android did(medium.com)
6 points by jalaziz 9y ago|1 comments
11.
by jalaziz 10y ago
I've been wondering the same thing. At the very least you should be able to argue that they've changed the contract and you should no longer be held liable for early termination.
12.
by jalaziz 10y ago
I agree completely. My bet is this is Comcast's way of fighting back against net neutrality. With 4K streaming coming fast, it seems like they want to further pad those profit margins under the guise of fairness.
13.
by jalaziz 10y ago
That's not true. Infrastructure costs money, absolutely. But infrastructure is largely a fixed cost (plus some maintenance cost). After that, it's all peering arrangements. ISPs here in the US can have some pretty ridiculous profi
14.
by jalaziz 10y ago
You're paying for a rate, not an absolute amount. The internet infrastructure works on that rate (bandwidth). You don't buy a 10GB switch or router, you buy a 1gbps switch or router. ISPs peer based on bandwidth. I do understand,
15.
by jalaziz 10y ago
Well aware of contention ratios. That's the gamble the ISP makes. Now they're trying to pass the risk onto the consumer. That shouldn't be the consumer's problem. That problem also doesn't quite relate to a data cap
16.
by jalaziz 10y ago
That's not what's going on. You're not paying a flat price. If you want more bandwidth, you pay for it. The currency for an ISP is bandwidth. The amount of data that's transferred does not matter. This is basically pure
17.
by jalaziz 10y ago
There is nothing reasonable about this. You pay Comcast for bandwidth. It shouldn't matter how much data you're using as long as you're not exceeding that bandwidth. If I pay for 250mbps, I should be able to download 24/