Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
jakeogh
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
65 ms
·
751.
▲
by
jakeogh
7y ago
Human sensory augmentation will save lives.
752.
▲
by
jakeogh
7y ago
We will see! Our intuition that we understanding something is often incomplete in critical ways. Exciting times ahead either way.
753.
▲
by
jakeogh
7y ago
Start with something easier, like simulating water. Our best ab-initio simulations, last time I checked, don't correctly predict it's phase change locations. Digital abstractions deliberately supress every single other interaction
754.
▲
by
jakeogh
7y ago
Binary computing is never going to emulate wetware on a reasonable scale. A few neurons? Sure. It's going to take a different pardigm, likely biological. Evolving FPGA's (by ignoring the digital abstraction) is a window into why.
755.
▲
by
jakeogh
7y ago
Sci-fi conditioning mixed with a hefty assumption that people are computers.
756.
▲
by
jakeogh
7y ago
There is no good reason to think pre-programmed computers are going to outperform human drivers when it counts. It's a prediction about the future, someting that has not happened yet. It's most likely wrong. No amount of marketing
757.
▲
by
jakeogh
7y ago
hiQ didnt sign a contract. It's public info. They broke the ToS, but unless the ToS get inserted into a contract, and signed by both parties we arent even in Civil Law terratory, which is what this excellent court decision confirmed.
758.
▲
by
jakeogh
7y ago
If it was really that easy then we would have SOPA, ACTA, CISPA, PIPA, TPP and about 20 other bad ideas put on paper. All of those failed, if they had not, MegaCorp would have significantly more power. Heck TPP had ways for a foreign corpor
759.
▲
by
jakeogh
7y ago
Sounds like we agree that's a bad thing. To your first sentence, no, they propose laws. They dont get to revise their ToS and have it be a violation of the law when you ignore it. That would be like the EPA making a rule, because they
760.
▲
by
jakeogh
7y ago
By letting ToS have the force of law...
761.
▲
by
jakeogh
7y ago
Your argument is to let corporations effectively make law.
762.
▲
by
jakeogh
7y ago
Pointless unless you want a one world governement to enforce a law monoculture.
763.
▲
by
jakeogh
7y ago
It's already legal. Adding law adds restrictions.
764.
▲
by
jakeogh
7y ago
APT's: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=csye_Jkp4eI
765.
▲
by
jakeogh
7y ago
We can't in principal encode it as a numeric copy; it's not measurable. Position or momentum. The mind isnt a closed system unless it's drawn as lightcurves.
766.
▲
by
jakeogh
7y ago
Yep it's totally the form factor. I looked at it again when I found that NXP system (thanks to #olimex:)... half considered asking about getting rid of the ram slots, ATX connector, PCI's and various tower plugs and adding the abi
767.
▲
by
jakeogh
7y ago
Heh, I hadn't either. My dream machine has 4x NVMe, 128G of soldered on RAM (with power control), a real SDR, plenty of GPIO, ADC/DAC. 2x ethernet, serial, CAN, novena style fpga, second SOC cpu with dma... basically a hacked up L
768.
▲
by
jakeogh
7y ago
I want a laptop where the all of the design files are open source. It would be worth a serious premium in addition to the premium I would pay for the open POWER system. The few we have now are maxed out at 4GB. Someone is going to do it...
769.
▲
by
jakeogh
7y ago
I agree. The humans are the bugs thing is an excuse that the pre-programmed proponents keep leaning on. That hypothetical has the unintentional implicit frame; as if it's the non pre-programmed humans that are the problem, when clearly
770.
▲
We Received a Message in Morse from Julian Assange
(sputniknews.com)
1 points
by
jakeogh
7y ago
|
0 comments
771.
▲
by
jakeogh
7y ago
Fun. Is there a way to accelerate?
772.
▲
by
jakeogh
7y ago
hiQ vs Linkedin was a Heller vs DC. This feels congruent.
773.
▲
by
jakeogh
7y ago
Do you know more now than you did a decade ago?
774.
▲
by
jakeogh
7y ago
Great org mentioned in the article: https://www.darksky.org
775.
▲
by
jakeogh
7y ago
:) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9161967
776.
▲
by
jakeogh
7y ago
True, but jamming wouldnt be necessary. Confirmation bias hacks work by preventing the target from even looking for the signal. Or worse.
777.
▲
by
jakeogh
7y ago
~100k years? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19937047 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20742898
778.
▲
by
jakeogh
7y ago
Consider the possibility it's not supposed to convince you earth is flat, yet you are the target audiance. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21057230
779.
▲
by
jakeogh
7y ago
"Its arcane rituals of parliamentary procedure and majority rule usually produce a victorious majority and a very dissatisfied minority that expects to raise its concerns, again, at the next possible meeting." so may extra words.
780.
▲
by
jakeogh
7y ago
https://rjlipton.wordpress.com/2010/10/23/galactic-algorithm...
More ›