jakeogh

45 ms·

481.
by jakeogh 6y ago
Which professional pre-peak predictions were surprisingly accurate?
482.
by jakeogh 6y ago
Obviously, I'm talking about professional predictions. If for some reason you care about armchair predictions, it's going to be 10 to 1 in the "way worse" range for a random sample here. Which accurate pre-peak predictio
483.
by jakeogh 6y ago
We achieved better results than _every_ pre-peak prediction. What do you measure?
484.
by jakeogh 6y ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16352498
485.
by jakeogh 7y ago
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NmRlvX3VrAQ
486.
by jakeogh 7y ago
It's speaking in public. Common or surprising isn't legally relevent. And since it's the internet; it can't be. It's one reason why sovergn groups of humans are so fantastic.
487.
by jakeogh 7y ago
I suppose you could patch in PAR encoding for data, would that be significantly different than specifying copies=N for data and/or making multiple pools single disk and raiding them?
488.
by jakeogh 7y ago
Most IRC clients are logging the conversation by default, and everyone knows it. Even if they werent; you're speaking in public.
489.
by jakeogh 7y ago
Where?
490.
Coronaviruses 101: Focus on Molecular Virology(youtube.com)
1 points by jakeogh 7y ago|0 comments
491.
by jakeogh 7y ago
Hitchens - Free Speech (2006): https://youtu.be/olefVguutfo
492.
FCC set to vote this week to expand, speed up Wi-Fi(cnet.com)
2 points by jakeogh 7y ago|0 comments
493.
Suppression of Expression Obscures the Truth About the Virus(amgreatness.com)
1 points by jakeogh 7y ago|0 comments
494.
by jakeogh 7y ago
A lot? Why? My experience on new information summed up by the vid in my profile. I still find it astonishing.
495.
by jakeogh 7y ago
Seriously: exercise. You will have more energy, feel better, and be mentally shaprer. Exabrial said it better, I just wanted to reiterate it. It's had an excellent impact on my life.
496.
by jakeogh 7y ago
In science, when errors are made, we are supposed to acknowledge and correct them, which is what the CDC did. Why base your opinion on a second order result rather than first hand outcomes? If we had not tested at all, and still had this _d
497.
by jakeogh 7y ago
Perhaps you just dont want to answer it.
498.
by jakeogh 7y ago
Do you know more now than you did ten years ago?
499.
by jakeogh 7y ago
Measured by what? We achieved better results than every single pre-peak best case estimated outcome. If you know of a predicted outcome that we havent come in under, please link to it.
500.
by jakeogh 7y ago
Historically, what I illuded to is almost a law of nature. I could have elaborated, but is it really necessary? People dont need stuff spelled out, and pointing that out didnt start a flame. That's the founder of CNN... his opinions ef
501.
by jakeogh 7y ago
Powerful people can be very religious. https://wearethene.ws/notable/95575
502.
by jakeogh 7y ago
Mail in voting is equivalent to electronic voting. The USPS is worthless in comparison to what we would lose. https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&query=jakeogh%20mail&t...
503.
by jakeogh 7y ago
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w1-GrBy67LY
504.
by jakeogh 7y ago
You and Alex agree. https://wearethene.ws/notable/94836
505.
by jakeogh 7y ago
I havent made any claims about who is responsible for 9/11, you are just well, making stuff up based on the (likely bad) information you have been exposed to. There is a video in my profile, I made it, you can draw your own conclusions
506.
by jakeogh 7y ago
This should be easy for you then. Is it normal for a man to tag an infant picture he posted #hotard? What are #chickenlovers?
507.
by jakeogh 7y ago
Or, you could avoid a meaningless term and be more specific. Conspiracy is a common class of crime, significant sections of US law are written to deal with them. Your use if it is classic; applying to a broad class, specifically anyone who
508.
by jakeogh 7y ago
Excellent example of confirmation bias hacks. Note how you avoid the actual subject, and instead make it personal, and (without evidence) are sure of what I "believe". I explained why and how that works in the link I provided. Not
509.
by jakeogh 7y ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15003606
510.
by jakeogh 7y ago
Ya totally normal tagging that baby pic #chickenlovers. Nothing odd at all about the "49th most powerful person in DC" tagging an infant #hotard. People should review the full archive, and his comments. RE distraction: https:&#x2

More ›