3 ms·
In science, when errors are made, we are supposed to acknowledge and correct them, which is what the CDC did. Why base your opinion on a second order result ra
by jakeogh 7y ago
In science, when errors are made, we are supposed to acknowledge and correct them, which is what the CDC did.
Why base your opinion on a second order result rather than first hand outcomes? If we had not tested at all, and still had this _drastically better than predicted_ result, might you still be unhappy about it?
And the NYT... They are not just a news orginization. Still run by the BBC's Mark Thompson I see.
https://imgur.com/VUdcIou https://imgur.com/VUdcIou
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CIMxvS-WEAER49I.png https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CIMxvS-WEAER49I.png
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CINJUoqUwAEkSip.jpg https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CINJUoqUwAEkSip.jpg