jahsome

18 ms·

301.
by jahsome 3y ago
The alternative is to create your own framework (named officially so, or not) which is by definition unsupported, unless your org prioritizes it. At which point you're in an identical position. Why not take advantage of the time it _is
302.
by jahsome 3y ago
I don't use react or vue. In fact, these days I don't use any frameworks, personally. You're absolutely correct the important decision is knowing when it's pertinent, i.e. when it serve organizational goals which of cour
303.
by jahsome 3y ago
I would love to hear what the people who inherited maintenance of your projects might say. There's another word for boring: stable. The mark of a good engineer is not the ability to craft sexy, clever, bespoke, ego-boosting application
304.
by jahsome 3y ago
Bandwidth ain't free.
305.
by jahsome 3y ago
I too arbitrarily define very narrow parameters for broad terms based on my personal preferences.
306.
by jahsome 3y ago
Great point thank you for making the distinction.
307.
by jahsome 3y ago
Moreover, dry counties exist.
308.
by jahsome 3y ago
Hey bud, go easy. I've got a couple different anus-type diagnoses myself, and commit very few crimes.
309.
by jahsome 3y ago
They're "open hardware", but it's not immediately clear what the panel is. Only a small number of repos in their github and the only e-ink-looking repo is called Glider. https://github.com/Modos-Labs&#x2F
310.
by jahsome 3y ago
Do you personally write utterly perfect code with absolutely no defects or unexpected/unintended consequences on the first try, every single time?
311.
by jahsome 3y ago
You had me up til that last paragraph. Call me crazy but xml just hurts my eyes. I'll always take a nicely formatted yaml doc with all the pains that come with it over the horrors of angle brackets and camel case.
312.
by jahsome 3y ago
But they're still running ads on the content, associating the content with advertisers. It's not "saving" their customers (advertisers). It's denying wages to the producer. I can't see it as anything other than
313.
by jahsome 3y ago
> Well they actually host a bunch of videos that they wont allow people to monetize. Is that an issue too? Personally, I say absolutely yes. Particularly because they'll still platform questionable content, sell ad space against it,
314.
by jahsome 3y ago
You're embarrassing yourself Benny.
315.
by jahsome 3y ago
No I didn't. And complaining about votes is against hn guidelines.
316.
by jahsome 3y ago
That's not what I asked.
317.
by jahsome 3y ago
I think it's more curious they're willing to at least imply moral imperative and say "this bad guy can't make money on our platform" but continue to distribute and profit off his content themselves. It's not im
318.
by jahsome 3y ago
That wouldn't cut it. The linked summary is pretty explicit about the four things governing online behavior, and not society overall. Online behavior is not society. The first point of the four relates to networking infrastructure. Is
319.
by jahsome 3y ago
How does that relate to the allegations or OPs comment?
320.
by jahsome 3y ago
When a channel is demonetized does that mean YouTube doesn't run ads at all on the channel's content, or do they still run ads and just don't pay out the share to the creator?
321.
by jahsome 3y ago
What are you saying here?
322.
by jahsome 3y ago
Did you accidentally a word about Magnus there, or did Magnus change his tune/mind?
323.
by jahsome 3y ago
I'm happy to see some competitors entering the market. Playing Breath of the Wild on switch was a pivotal experience. I felt a distorted sense of being tethered when using my PC for a while. I really like my steam deck, but the screen
324.
by jahsome 3y ago
Not the healthiest of hobbies but I stumbled into DOTA (the league of legends precursor) 20 years ago and have never fallen out of love. It's been a dangerous addiction at several points of my life, but in many ways has revealed to me
325.
by jahsome 3y ago
I personally prefer earnest over disingenuous. There are fewer opportunities to misunderstand. A question by it's nature isn't aggressive. The words "should" and "we" are the real cancers IMO, as in "we sh
326.
by jahsome 3y ago
That's a pretty heavy accusation to levy without a shred of evidence. The pg article doesn't describe direct payments either from what I read. It describes the symbiotic and borderline corrupt relationship but not money exchanging
327.
by jahsome 3y ago
How did you determine nyt is being paid to promote the tour?
328.
by jahsome 3y ago
I'm not an expert but as I understand it, laws are a component of policy. By at least one definition policy broadly encompasses how those laws are implemented, and enforced, as well as regulations that aren't technically part of l
329.
by jahsome 3y ago
Interesting theory. If I tell you I read Jurassic Park, does that that mean I'm a brontosaurus?
330.
by jahsome 3y ago
Most of the time I'd agree with you. But this is the Engadget. They're just too successful/savvy and established for this particular instance not to be deliberate. There is a lot of truth in much of what you said, but headlin

More ›