jackvezkovic

6 ms·

1.
by jackvezkovic 3y ago
This EU regulation diminishes the incentive of researching and developing a new technology in this area. This is a fact. And no, innovation usually does not come from a bunch of companies sitting down to cooperate on a new version. First th
2.
by jackvezkovic 3y ago
actually, I think the guy knows exactly what it means: automate stuff with AI and replace jobs
3.
by jackvezkovic 4y ago
Big nuclear power plants are not the ones behind regulations. Big oil and carbon-based power plants and others are the ones that lobby for nuclear power plant regulations.
4.
by jackvezkovic 4y ago
It's "Security Through AI Obscurity"
5.
Is Looker Dead?(jpmonteiro.substack.com)
1 points by jackvezkovic 5y ago|0 comments
6.
by jackvezkovic 5y ago
Bonus point: everything gets documented for future references if needed. Also, when I am on holidays but still have that itch to check how the team is doing, I just check that channel.
7.
by jackvezkovic 5y ago
We also have a remote team in different timezones. What we do instead is just the slack version of a "stand-up". Everyone writes whenever they start what they did yesterday as bullet points, what they will do today and if there ar
8.
by jackvezkovic 5y ago
There can always be leaks, anonymous sources that confirm something is still ongoing, despite what was publicly announced. Brand image is important.
9.
by jackvezkovic 5y ago
Cool stuff. Just tried out 'average votes count per length of tagline': https://app.veezoo.com/shared/30d67d9d-4e97-4bb1-a6ec-e7d6e2... Missing a mobile version though.
10.
by jackvezkovic 6y ago
So, if we in the future are able to clone a Mona Lisa perfectly, will it be as worth as the original? Does it decrease the value of the original?
11.
by jackvezkovic 7y ago
Exactly. When the international community makes it clearly more (short term) economically advantageous to preserve the Amazon, then we will have a more sustainable solution.
12.
by jackvezkovic 7y ago
It is actually quite simple to understand. Don't be arrogant in proposing to "buy" a part of another country, because "they don't know how to take care of it". This is the kind of mindset that is counterproduct
13.
by jackvezkovic 7y ago
It's not whataboutism. It's a matter of principles. International pressure to "buy" a part of another country under the flag of environmental protection is not a reasonable option. It is a quite extreme measure. Why go t
14.
by jackvezkovic 7y ago
I find it incredible how people are eager to protect the environment in other people's countries before taking a deep look in-house. Suggesting to buy a strategically important area of Brazil under the umbrella of saving the world is j
15.
Java vs. OpenDoc (1997)(macobserver.com)
2 points by jackvezkovic 8y ago|0 comments
16.
by jackvezkovic 8y ago
That moment when you step out of your safe Scala world just to realize that people still face NPEs.
17.
by jackvezkovic 8y ago
The state spending money to provide you a search engine to select the information they want to show you? Just sounds like a terrible idea.
18.
by jackvezkovic 8y ago
> I don't care if they are Brazilians or Norwegian. If you leave an open hole for someone to fall down you are being negligent. We agree then. > _Brazilians_ don't leave uncovered holes in the street because of something ent
19.
by jackvezkovic 8y ago
> They leave because they are lazy... Probably sounds better in the original German. These proofs by anecdotes are really fast food for the biased mind. Just as a thought experiment, if Brazilians are inherently 'lazy' as you s