jackson1372

10 ms·

1.
by jackson1372 3y ago
I don't have sources, it's just a rumor.
2.
by jackson1372 3y ago
It's an open secret that Mistral finetunes on GPT outputs
3.
by jackson1372 3y ago
claude.ai
4.
by jackson1372 3y ago
The article doesn't mention two great features on iOS: - Move cursor by tap-and-hold on soace bar - tap-tap for word selection and tap-tap-tap for sentence selection. I use these two constantly
5.
by jackson1372 3y ago
Claude Instant 1.1 is a better comparison for the price/performance of GPT-3.5
6.
by jackson1372 3y ago
GRE writing: 5 for Claude vs 4 for GPT-4 Bar exam: 76.5 for Claude vs 75.7 for GPT-4
7.
by jackson1372 3y ago
See the pricing PDF[^1] and API docs[^2], but TL;DR: - Price per token doesn't change compared to regular models - Existing api users have access now by setting the `model` param to "claude-v1-100k" or "claude-instant-v1
8.
by jackson1372 5y ago
ANTHROPIC ・ Frontend/UX Engineer ・ SF-based ・ Remote-friendly ・ https://www.anthropic.com Rapidly build prototype interfaces for large language models. Align AI with human values. Tech stack: Next.js, Svelte, Python Appl
9.
I Blew the Whistle on John Searle(jacksonkernion.com)
1 points by jackson1372 5y ago|0 comments
10.
Best web dev stack for long-term open source SPA
1 points by jackson1372 7y ago|0 comments
11.
by jackson1372 7y ago
Isn't the explanation for this that the world actually does work in some way or other and that it's not just infinite chaos and so if you keep throwing parameters at some problem, you will eventually stumble upon the "real&
12.
by jackson1372 7y ago
The reason you want to over-parameterize your model is that it protects you from "bad bounce" learning trajectories. You effectively spread out your overfitting risk until it's pretty close to 0. Or at least that's the w
13.
by jackson1372 8y ago
If you read between the lines, it's clear that Spotify was able to make a normal watch app. But they wanted to make one that had special functionality not yet allowed by Apple, for any app, not just Spotify.
14.
by jackson1372 9y ago
But what does 'corresponds more closely to the mathematics' mean? The relevant point is just that the mathematics, alone, doesn't settle the theoretical question. In general, it's hard to use Occam's razor in a non-
15.
by jackson1372 9y ago
All three interpretations are 'just the wave function'. What separates them is the metaphysical interpretation of what is 'behind' the wave function.
16.
by jackson1372 9y ago
Precisely how to understand causation is controversial. But I'll just say that most philosophers don't find anything incoherent in the idea of nonlocal causation. (Hume's classic attack on local causation might be worth a loo
17.
by jackson1372 9y ago
> we have to assume some sort of isomorphism between the map (our theory) and the territory (the world) But a mathematical model != a theoretical model. The very same mathematical model will be compatible with uncountably many theoretica
18.
by jackson1372 9y ago
> if you already accept "superposition" at the level of quantum states, you don't have to invoke anything new to deal with so-called "collapse" All three interpretations of QM 'accept' superposition, co
19.
by jackson1372 9y ago
The standard story about measurement/observation and quantum collapse is not the only interpretation of the available data. There are, broadly, three kinds of interpretations of what's 'really' going on behind the scenes
20.
by jackson1372 9y ago
Philosophy PhD Student
21.
by jackson1372 9y ago
Nissan has been working on this: https://www.wired.com/2017/01/nissans-self-driving-teleopera...
22.
by jackson1372 9y ago
I'm no expert, but I think this is a "known bug". Russian oligarchs buying property in London, for instance, is a big reason for that market's insane prices. One 'solution' is property taxes, which disincentivi
23.
by jackson1372 9y ago
1. I wouldn't put it in terms of time being "more fundamental than physics". We can mean two things by 'physics': the thing that is the object of study in the Physics department or the theory that gets generated by
24.
by jackson1372 9y ago
I should disclose: I'm an A-theory-supporting philosopher. (Sigh. Why are philosophers and physicists always disagreeing?! We should be friends!) My above analogy to the left/right issue is the example I use to introduce students
25.
by jackson1372 9y ago
Consider an analogy to the 'reality' of right/left orientation. We stand on opposite sides of a table, and I say "There's a cup on the right" and you say "There's a cup on the left". Who's r
26.
by jackson1372 10y ago
I'm a philosophy Philosophy PhD student. There can be a number of different reasons to read the original text of some older work of philosophy. But two central reasons that seem to be ignored here are: 1. Philosophy is closer to logic
27.
After Trump's win, the importance of politics(medium.com)
2 points by jackson1372 10y ago|0 comments
28.
How selection bias makes the internet self-righteous(medium.com)
1 points by jackson1372 10y ago|0 comments
29.
by jackson1372 10y ago
Understood in the right way, there's nothing wring with that comparison. Certainly, people misuse/misunderstand the information-processing metaphor/claim. (Though the people who do this tend not to be cognitjve scientists.) B
30.
by jackson1372 10y ago
My argument is not: there should never be clubs that are, in fact, single gender. My argument is: gender itself shouldn't be used as a criterion for group membership.

More ›