jack9

39 ms·

361.
by jack9 9y ago
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/01/climate/china-energy-comp...
362.
by jack9 9y ago
H2 is an assumption you've made. When talking about a nuclear explosion. There is hydrogen in a number of compounds (notably water and hydrogen sulfide) present in the atmosphere that could be relevant sources. The ppm being incidental
363.
by jack9 9y ago
> I buy it could have been a yellow paint tube. I don't know how anyone would come to that conclusion. It's "definitely not possibly" (adverb chaining, really?) a tube squirting yellow in image. If ascribing modern sy
364.
by jack9 9y ago
> The line you quote is the wrong line I'm very sure it is not. Article 1, Section 4. > The topic of "how apportionment is performed" is a different line. That's not how the law is read (X "topic" is gov
365.
by jack9 9y ago
> Why should we do the right thing unless other countries do exactly what we want That's not my sentiment. The right thing is the question at hand, as to attempting to combat global warming, not hoping for some pyrrhic PR victory. I
366.
by jack9 9y ago
Individuals can do better, but nations in aggregate are acting to increase global warming. The CO2 footprint game is a tool for political spin, not identifying what bodies are at fault now. Is it the US because the President broke out of a
367.
by jack9 9y ago
I believe the science shows this as well. However, putting it on the same level as heavy metals in an infographic...is just fear mongering.
368.
by jack9 9y ago
> I'm pretty sure that the states get to decide this particular matter for themselves Please participate in the discussion by checking on the relevant sources you're citing. From the US Constitution: The Times, Places and Manne
369.
by jack9 9y ago
> Currently the US is 1 of 3 countries not cooperating on climate change That's demonstrably false as a leader in environmentally friendly technology (both participation and development). Specifically, what you consider cooperating
370.
by jack9 9y ago
So it's the US's fault that other countries are acting badly? This blame game isn't even coherent. China, India, and some of the other disproportionate polluters are to blame, not some whack job US president who decided not t
371.
by jack9 9y ago
Why? Federal holiday? Nope. Top-two primaries? Nope. The us constitution doesnt address political parties, currently. Redistricting rules? Nope. Take a look at Article 1, Section 4 of the us constitution and/or https://ball
372.
by jack9 9y ago
The moment I saw flouride, I was done. https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/but-not-simpler/why-por... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_fluoridation_controversy
373.
by jack9 9y ago
I'm not sure that's an apt description either. Haxl's features include auto batching of IO through parallelism and a temporal cache...for error logging when failures occur. It's spelled out in the first minute he talks a
374.
by jack9 9y ago
This doesn't make much sense to put in the view. The view is the state and the data that is not visual or the representations of the visual (checkbox :checked = 1 otherwise 0 in the model) isn't solved by this. You have now just m
375.
by jack9 9y ago
That's not uncommon for new languages. Swift is definitely not in the "move fast" column, even taking that into consideration.
376.
by jack9 9y ago
The first couple points ("encapsulation", specifically no private vars) and interface conflicts are not issues worth complaining about. More importantly, we have 0 evidence that using private/protected in software is better t
377.
by jack9 9y ago
> Article is a bit naive about what it takes to run a shared service. This is a bad assumption. Loggly is a shared service. > Any API that AWS ES exposes has to be there forever This a bad assumption. No API is forever. Maybe you mean
378.
by jack9 9y ago
He's trying to articulate using arbitrary semantic uri schemes (that was just a simple example) rather than HTTP verbs. Ultimately, you have to document them in your APIs anyway and the caching reasoning (along with all the others I&#x
379.
by jack9 9y ago
> Efficiency and cheapness would go against the Whole Foods brand. I don't know what this means. The WF experience has nothing to do with these things. The price (cheap or less-than-expensive) and efficiency (I think you mean availa
380.
by jack9 9y ago
I've not read the reddit "frontpage" in years. I do run into it when I'm not logged in, but I don't look at it at all.
381.
by jack9 9y ago
> I imagined a lot of low income and poor people lining up for a shot they may not need, and in fact may be harmful That's an interesting spin, which may be true of other types of injection. However for flu shots, it can save lives
382.
by jack9 9y ago
> But the environmental burden of even the current population is quite severe, is it not? Most people fall between the extremes of a moral bar they are trying to measure human behavior by or you accept that everything that happens in the
383.
by jack9 9y ago
> 1. Perpetual, royalty-free, worldwide license to use your DNA Not every contract clause is valid. This could be challenged in court and as you cannot authorize the licensing of your DNA after your death, I'm not sure how anyone wo
384.
by jack9 9y ago
I simply think you're lying to yourself. It's both literally and theoretically simpler to write and digest let's start with the simplest case, {}. Prone to bugs is a matter of debate, depending on a number of factors.
385.
by jack9 9y ago
> I do think Amazon’s culture is incredible and Bezos is the most impressive CEO out there chuckle Very very few people who work at (or have worked at Amazon) think this. Having worked with Amazon since 1999, I have never been impresse
386.
by jack9 9y ago
Your original subject is "His core base", which was what I referenced. You are talking about party politicians. In this situation, we may both be correct.
387.
by jack9 9y ago
> The fact is, the majority of the voting public did not vote for Trump. If you want change, you have to focus on an issue. If this is the issue, then you need to stop saying "Trump" as if he is special, since it appears to be
388.
by jack9 9y ago
> I guess They made a choice to treat multiple applications as one. That's not what I would prefer and is less useful in my opinion. There are some CDNs and payment processors that are in operation, that use the 200 error response,
389.
by jack9 9y ago
> client was received, understood, accepted, and processed successfully How is this not processed successfully? The request was processed successfully by the webserver ... and the error was handled by the application, so you can reli
390.
by jack9 9y ago
> There are near zero crossover votes on either side. Citation? Because I don't know a single Dem or Rep who endorses removing Net Neutrality (although I think I just read the first comment to say so on HN above).

More ›