Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
jMyles
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
10 ms
·
151.
▲
by
jMyles
6mo ago
I hear people make this comparison all the time, and while it is facially a bit funny I guess, I really don't think it holds up in any serious way. What is so similar about our world to that of idiocracy? In almost all the ways that m
152.
▲
by
jMyles
6mo ago
> I find the production and consumption of AI music to be uniquely... anti-human. I mean, I'm a professional musician - not sure if that gives me more credibility or less - but I don't feel slighted by folks listening to music
153.
▲
by
jMyles
6mo ago
> The US , when finally back in control by reasonable adults This rings as "make America great again", just with a different mythology standing-in for "again". The US (or at least the US _state_) hasn't been in c
154.
▲
by
jMyles
6mo ago
...is that even bad? It kinda seems good to have that signal before the military and media spin takes hold. I was kinda on the fence about this debate, but your arguments have actually pushed me away.
155.
▲
by
jMyles
7mo ago
> But, even if you dismiss the idea of international standards, this is clearly very bad for US soldiers (and sailors, airmen, etc). I wonder if they see that. Even if you dismiss the idea of international standards, a no-quarter declara
156.
▲
by
jMyles
7mo ago
It is interesting to consider what "jailbroken" really means for a model+model interface. It's a bit different from the way that word is used for a mobile device, for example - in that setting, it usually means that there is
157.
▲
by
jMyles
7mo ago
I disagree that integration is commutative. Often, we see a feature which is important to free use of a computer as a general-purpose tool locked behind an ever-changing and/or poorly documented API in a closed-source, centralized, de-
158.
▲
by
jMyles
7mo ago
We would never force a user to watch a 15-second ad every 5 minutes. We simply augment their content with a 15-second fully-immersive aesthetic and psychological experience which highlights the quality of our sponsor's product.
159.
▲
by
jMyles
7mo ago
> If you made anything that was worth protecting you might feel differently. Please don't put those of us who create so-called 'intellectual property' for a living in the middle of this. We didn't ask for government p
160.
▲
by
jMyles
7mo ago
> now I got bigger problems but I'm still mad. I'm not so sure they're unrelated. The bondage of intellectual property forces very particular branches of human development to the exclusion of others. It's no surprise
161.
▲
by
jMyles
7mo ago
https://web.archive.org/web/20210522003136/https://blog.nucy...
162.
▲
by
jMyles
7mo ago
> those without capital and moats still have the power of writing law If the divide is over who can write code and who can write statutes enforced by the state, it's obvious that the latter is the one that requires capital and moats
163.
▲
by
jMyles
7mo ago
There have been both inductive and deductive solutions to open math problems by humans in the past decade, including to fairly high-profile problems.
164.
▲
by
jMyles
7mo ago
That phenomenon exists regardless. There may be some benefit to make it transparent. All war is for profit anyway - on sufficiently long time scales, stopping war is the imperative.
165.
▲
by
jMyles
7mo ago
You're right - but of course it's telling that "don't go outside" is the only prescription to respond to qualms about terraforming the entire planet in service of one industry's (statistically quite dangerous)
166.
▲
by
jMyles
7mo ago
...not mention of encryption. Although the idea is lovely, I'm not going to encourage my kiddo to chat with his buddies on a service that can hoover up their imagination for later manipulation.
167.
▲
by
jMyles
7mo ago
I have no problem sharing the roads with drunks. It's the cars that scare me.
168.
▲
by
jMyles
7mo ago
It is a crime, obviously. Things don't magically become crimes depending on the employer of the perpetrator - that's the whole point of "a nation of laws and not of men." It's legal for you to arrest someone if you
169.
▲
by
jMyles
7mo ago
...legal weed is awful? Weed is better, cheaper, safer, and more diverse that it has been in my lifetime (and I happily smoked it while it was illegal also). Legal weed has been an enormous success (not that there was ever much doubt that i
170.
▲
by
jMyles
7mo ago
> Why can't we handle this the same way we handle knives, guns and chainsaws: require adults to secure the device before letting minors near them? Is this a thing? My 10yo has used all three of those things. If there were some legi
171.
▲
by
jMyles
7mo ago
Huh. I just watched Full Metal Jacket last night for the first time in a few years.
172.
▲
by
jMyles
7mo ago
...maybe I missed a memo here or something, but I thought this is exactly what we (all of us - the humans) _weren't_ going to do? > “We think there’s a moral imperative to put these robots into war instead of soldiers,” says Mike Le
173.
▲
Rise of the AI Soldiers
(time.com)
3 points
by
jMyles
7mo ago
|
1 comments
174.
▲
by
jMyles
7mo ago
Third option: a web-of-trust that allows you to see the vectors required to connect you to a given commenter, and which of your known friends and friends-of-friends has already attested their humanity.
175.
▲
by
jMyles
7mo ago
The obvious way to keep human spaces is via webs-of-trust. If you play bluegrass or old time (or beopop or hip-hop / proto-hip-hop) or other traditional styles of music where the ensemble is a de facto web-of-trust, join us on pickiped
176.
▲
by
jMyles
7mo ago
RLCD worth a mention too.
177.
▲
by
jMyles
7mo ago
> If you watch a video like [0], the squiggles aren't real, they're an artifact of a rolling shutter camera. ...is this correct? You can say this about any oscillating phenomenon - that doesn't mean it's not 're
178.
▲
by
jMyles
7mo ago
This presumes that the nation's security is bolstered by the government's ability to keep secrets. It strikes me that, even if this is true in some ways, the opposite is true in others.
179.
▲
by
jMyles
7mo ago
> Different activists are different. "Information wants to be free" activists are against different things from "artists trying to make an honest living" activists. ...uhhh, I mean, maybe my perspective is skewed beca
180.
▲
by
jMyles
8mo ago
> That means it belongs to the American people, not individuals for their private gain. This is a strong case that there ought not to be any such thing as a secret opinion or confidential advice from the White House OLC - and I agree wit
More ›