j33zusjuice

11 ms·

91.
by j33zusjuice 3y ago
Does this all feel familiar? https://youtu.be/_tpB-B8BXk0 I don’t know if it’s always this way, but I create emergencies and catastrophes because I otherwise have no motivation to do anything. My back has to be against the
92.
by j33zusjuice 3y ago
I think it’s the state of the chemical that’s the biggest issue. I know for sure that PTFE is highly toxic to basically all life when it’s airborne, which happens when you heat your non-stick pans to over 450°F/233°C. There usually is
93.
by j33zusjuice 3y ago
They could do the exact same thing as wework without absorbing their debts, though.
94.
by j33zusjuice 3y ago
Are you autistic or something? Serious question. You seem to have a hard time understanding other perspectives, and you missed obvious sarcasm/hyperbole there.
95.
by j33zusjuice 3y ago
OTOH, thank goodness for them or you wouldn’t find jobs so easily, nor would you command the salary you command.
96.
by j33zusjuice 3y ago
We’re not talking about software engineering. The recommendation to read a book about basic computing is obviously not intended for computer scientists. Depending on your definition of “service” here, I’d argue that most code is not written
97.
by j33zusjuice 3y ago
I see my desktop at least weekly, but only because I shut down my computer on the weekends I’m not on call. I can’t remember the last time I used it to open anything, regardless of the OS. I use the taskbar/dock, and the start menu&#x2
98.
by j33zusjuice 3y ago
Rofl. Please don’t vote.
99.
by j33zusjuice 3y ago
Hawley’s on the same level as Greene. They’re insane, incredibly stupid, or incredibly bad.
100.
by j33zusjuice 3y ago
Idk enough about this discussion to argue it, but his hypothesis does not imply your second point couldn't be true. > your answer is just a hypothesis, not a proof. these things can be studied (by studying abiogenesis in-vitro), an
101.
by j33zusjuice 3y ago
Sure, it could be a slippery slope, but the problem is that no one can strictly define what “criminal-looking” means. That term is often used synonymously with “urban style,” which means “black people, and others who dress like black people
102.
by j33zusjuice 3y ago
Strictly define criminal-looking.
103.
by j33zusjuice 3y ago
Of course they say that, they make a percentage on the money you invest with them. But it feels like a really obvious piece of any risk assessment. And your risk tolerance heavily depends on how much you can afford to lose. But I guess that
104.
by j33zusjuice 3y ago
That only matters to people who are alive today and for the next several hundred years. On a long enough time line, things will balance out, or humanity will go extinct. Either way, you’re dead way before it happens, so why care about silly
105.
by j33zusjuice 3y ago
Painfully bad take. Talking about how gerrymandering doesn’t matter because a millennium from now, it’ll balance out. It can lead to immense suffering in the short-to-reasonably-long-term. Gerrymandering could lead to a bunch of complete lu
106.
by j33zusjuice 3y ago
I actually can see the MS perspective of not allowing applications to directly modify the default application for a given purpose. If apps can never do it, it removes some amount of vulnerability from OS. Applying fixes to block application
107.
by j33zusjuice 3y ago
There are still a handful of Linux magazines that I see at some stores where I buy computer gear. I guess I don’t know that they’re American, but they’re sold in America, and printed in English. That seems close enough to me.
108.
by j33zusjuice 3y ago
Yes, but as you know, this discussion isn’t to prove that the US is the worst country in the world. We don’t even consider countries like those that you’re talking about in these conversations because they’re so behind and barbaric. What’s
109.
by j33zusjuice 3y ago
I’m willing to bet that the features you’ve seen removed are taken out because their utilization is low, and there’s some associated maintenance cost. I’d also like to know what other features were removed. I had never heard of subscription
110.
by j33zusjuice 3y ago
I know you said “by default” so I’m assuming you know some ways around this, but in case you don’t, or for anyone who might find this useful … you can be really specific with curl outputs. It’s pretty sick. curl -sS -w '%{http_code} %{
111.
by j33zusjuice 3y ago
How often do you use dd that this really matters? Just curious. I’ve run dd maybe 20 times in the 5-6 years I’ve worked with Linux professionally.
112.
by j33zusjuice 3y ago
Could? Look around, that’s what it means.
113.
by j33zusjuice 3y ago
Very
114.
by j33zusjuice 3y ago
Apple News+? I think you get access to NYT, WaPo, and a bunch of other paywalled stuff.
115.
by j33zusjuice 3y ago
Bard is terrible, by comparison. ChatGPT feels like spontaneous answers. Google Bard will literally copy top search result answers to questions, and doesn’t answer them relevantly. It’s a bad extension of search.
116.
by j33zusjuice 3y ago
Your experience is not unique. I’ll never go back to a psych ward. It was the worst thing I’ve ever experienced.
117.
by j33zusjuice 3y ago
The person you’re replying to is not worth the time. > I can see how someone without a good grasp of the English language might feel it implies that Only an asshole would say that. Only an asshole would be so confidently incorrect.
118.
by j33zusjuice 3y ago
It’s very well documented. To the point I’m honestly surprised you haven’t heard of it before. But that’s fine: Facebook paid $85,000,000 to some content moderators. YouTube paid a single moderator like $4,500,000. There’s also a 2022 case
119.
by j33zusjuice 3y ago
But working in the 21st century is paradise, and no one who doesn’t *want* to be taken advantage of or mistreated or forgotten about ever is because the market is totally free, and there is no such thing as power imbalance when negotiating
120.
by j33zusjuice 3y ago
Because everyone knows about that situation with contract positions. He did work at Google, and if he added that it was through a contractor when explaining that the salary was too low, people would not be confused.

More ›