izacus

3 ms·

31.
by izacus 20d ago
It's not the consumers only option though.
32.
by izacus 20d ago
That explanation doesn't pass a sniff test if you even try to Google anything about car manufacturer data collection practices.
33.
by izacus 20d ago
79% of car buyers explicitly said they won't buy a car without carplay: https://www.cnbc.com/2022/07/22/apple-carplay-could-be-a-tro... So the numbers check out and there's no need for you to find t
34.
by izacus 20d ago
> And this disparaging language about commenters is not OK. Please stop. Nothing about that statement is disparaging - just because you don't want to hear it, doesn't make it insulting. Calling out nonsense is important, especi
35.
by izacus 20d ago
There is no "applause" in my post - please learn to read before you take up your bigcorp defender shield and think for a second why you're fighting against your own benefit.
36.
by izacus 20d ago
And Linux support on M Macs would also have a "real job", what is your point exactly? I find it so bizarre that some of you here are defending a megacorporation that could have easily afforded to provide drivers for Linux Kernel l
37.
by izacus 20d ago
Apple could contribute as well, like Intel does for their Thunderbolt controllers. Why are you demanding a user does that for free instead of the big corp that made the platform?
38.
by izacus 20d ago
> I don’t think many people realize how easily Apple could have locked down the laptop to be able to not run any alternate OS at all and the number of lost sales would be so negligibly small as to not matter. They chose to leave it open.
39.
by izacus 22d ago
That's just plainly false.
40.
by izacus 22d ago
No, they mean customized SoCs which what those chips are as well
41.
by izacus 22d ago
> I think it's deceptive because people think they will get better privacy/security with a /e/ fairphone when it's actually much worse than an iPhone. That's just blatantly not true though - even iPhones col
42.
by izacus 22d ago
I think you should listen to bringup of Linux on Playstation talk from CCC to understand that those platforms are much more than just "somewhat customized". There are whole sections of peripheral chips missing and they behave quit
43.
by izacus 22d ago
This is about a WiFi client - on WiFi networks the AP station chooses frequency and manufacturers/driver writers fuck up legal frequency lists and regulatory codes all the time.
44.
by izacus 22d ago
Moving the goalposts to "it's not their fault that it doesn't work" doesn't really change it doesn't work.
45.
by izacus 22d ago
There's quite a list you can get even from GrapheneOS's posts - among other things, there's a rather large set of apps that will outright crash when MTE is enabled.
46.
by izacus 23d ago
Where are you gonna go when everyone has them?
47.
by izacus 24d ago
Actually functionality, stability of apps and features people use.
48.
by izacus 24d ago
99.9% od the code GrapheneOS uses and 100% of hardware (including one like Titan security chip handling storage encryption and key store) is from Google. So what are you on about man - it's easy to take someone else's work and put
49.
by izacus 24d ago
You mean they pay for the video storage, video streaming bandwidth, transcode CPU and serving the videos with ads on their content.
50.
by izacus 25d ago
So let's start with the worse one.
51.
by izacus 25d ago
That's just absolute nonsense, where do you get these kind of ideas? Just because you don't have monopoly on your stupid ideas, you don't get to hire Pinkerton's to beat others.
52.
by izacus 25d ago
Tens of thousands dollars of donations over decades is a very small amount of money even outside US.
53.
by izacus 25d ago
None of my machines or most other machines used those tactics to install it. We installed it because it was heck of a faster browser in times when others sucked.
54.
by izacus 25d ago
Advertising a browser is now "shady"? And yes, both things can be true which is why lying about one of them is wrong.
55.
by izacus 25d ago
Just because they advertised the browser, it didn't mean it wasn't actually better no matter how much you hate that fact. It's really disgusting to see such misinformation spread because you hate what actually happened.
56.
by izacus 27d ago
That's not what I claimed or said, do read my posts please and project less :)
57.
by izacus 27d ago
Omarchy seems to be pentested by a bunch of angry haters. Who's pentesting your arch install? :P
58.
by izacus 27d ago
Let's see how that goes considering Motorola's track record of support :)
59.
by izacus 28d ago
GrapheneOS is fully dependant on the OEM of the phone to supply them with up to date drivers and can't support their builds longer than that.
60.
by izacus 28d ago
It's hard if you think of it as an afterthought. It's easy if you keep it in mind from the start and choose your stack and approach correctly from the start. That's usually the problem with startup software - most if startup

More ›