iusewindows

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by iusewindows 2mo ago

   He is irrelevant to future trends, as should be clear from basic reading comprehension. And so what...? Tens of thousands of people, probably more, have worked in film. Each one of these is immune to criticism and an accurate futurist? My p
2. 2.▲
   by iusewindows 2mo ago

   Nolan is irrelevant. He is the last of a dying breed. Once him and his ilk are gone, studios will go 100% into AI slop, Oscars be damned. No company is funneling 200 million into risky Oscar bait when they can make one hour Tiktok equivalen
3. 3.▲
   by iusewindows 1y ago

   Today I read a stupid Hackernews comment about how AI is useless. Therefore Hackernews is stupid. Oh, I need a filtered list of which comments to read? Do you build computers by ordering random parts off Alibaba and complaining when they ar
4. 4.▲
   by iusewindows 2y ago

   The shovel analogy is typically used to discuss tools versus goals, irrespective of the microeconomics of buying and selling. I can use another sector, biotech, as an example. The sequencing industry spends billions of dollars designing and
5. 5.▲
   Ask HN: Currently, is it better to work on AI shovels or AI applications?

   6 points by iusewindows 2y ago|7 comments