iudqnolq

33 ms·

421.
by iudqnolq 3y ago
My gut feeling is that machine learning is pretty good at this kind of text categorization. You could also try going old school and using stylometry. There are a bunch of companies trying to sell GPT detection. But also remember captcha sta
422.
by iudqnolq 3y ago
Curious why you don't consider refactoring the file layout before making the torrent.
423.
by iudqnolq 3y ago
Mostly agree. But there is no LLM equivalent of prepared statements available, that's the problem. And I don't think this is necessary to have multi-turn statements. Assuming there's some other technical constraint, because y
424.
by iudqnolq 3y ago
Here's an example of a deeply misleading article. Reading this you wouldn't know the new law only eliminates bail for misdemeanors and nonviolent felonies. You wouldn't know that while judges can't set high bail because
425.
by iudqnolq 3y ago
Check out the book "500 Lines or Less: Experienced programmers solve interesting problems" I especially like the chapter "A Python Interpreter Written in Python": https://aosabook.org/en/500L/a-
426.
by iudqnolq 3y ago
ChatGPT 3.5 gets the wrong answer but still doesn't sound like a regular human. Saying "we'll need to remember" about something on the right wikipedia page but not actually required to answer the question is a telltale s
427.
by iudqnolq 3y ago
ChatGPT 3.5: > The result of multiplying 7492 by 4812 is 36,028,704. Whelp, maybe we'll survive a little longer.
428.
by iudqnolq 3y ago
Huh. I see a very significant drop in battery life if I use gps for tracking. My phone would last for days with the screen off, airplane mode, and no apps running in the background. Add tracking and it lasts maybe 10 hours. (I pay attention
429.
by iudqnolq 3y ago
https://www.texastribune.org/2023/04/27/texas-house-rogue-pr...
430.
by iudqnolq 3y ago
But that wouldn't be an exoneration. The exoneration rate for criminal defendants sentenced to death is around 4%, see my citation 3 in the original post. (And it wouldn't "almost certainly" lead to a tossed conviction.
431.
by iudqnolq 3y ago
My impression is that it's higher than those numbers too. What I meant to say is that death penalty eligible defendants get better representation than pretty much everyone else. So their wrongful conviction rate should be lower than av
432.
by iudqnolq 3y ago
Not necessarily. A PD might well be much better than an affordable private counsel. It's definitely better to go private if you're rich, it depends on specifics if you aren't.
433.
by iudqnolq 3y ago
Edit: I realized writing this response that I forgot to link my citation 3 in the post you replied to. I also wasn't clear what it was measuring. But to clarify that number is exonerations only, which requires innocence. A legal findin
434.
by iudqnolq 3y ago
Not on this subject. The NYTimes is heavily conservative when it comes to the criminal judicial system. They've written articles espousing essentially the same positions as this one. They've led the charge to kill bail reform in N
435.
by iudqnolq 3y ago
> The prosecution should have asked for higher bail if he was further threat to society If he is a risk to society that won't change however much money he pays. A millionaire murderer isn't less dangerous than a minimum wage on
436.
by iudqnolq 3y ago
Remember that cities have limited autonomy in the American system. A blue city in a red state has red laws.
437.
by iudqnolq 3y ago
You can't use the results of the system to validate the system. Your 2-10% wrongful conviction rate matches the rate capital defendants are legally found to have been wrongfully convicted[3]. They're a good subset to focus on beca
438.
by iudqnolq 3y ago
That's a fair point, I'd forgotten it was hard to discover. That's because it worked well for me. I looked it up at one point and then I had it configured how I want. The new system is much more annoying for me, but it might
439.
by iudqnolq 3y ago
huh? Twitter has always had chronological timelines. Only thing Musk added in that regard is a buggy even more magic "For You" that's harder to ignore. On my phone at least the app switched to the For You tab every restart an
440.
by iudqnolq 3y ago
Yes. If you stay away from high follower accounts and block/ignore blue checks it's still ok. But you're right, those comments are awful. > "she" > Well there goes the neighborhood > Twitter was nice while
441.
by iudqnolq 3y ago
He obviously can't be at all three full time. Investors in SpaceX and Tesla have complained he's spending significant time in the Twitter office and neglecting the other two. Just because it would make business sense for him to fo
442.
by iudqnolq 3y ago
Technical people are the same. See for example SSL.
443.
by iudqnolq 3y ago
In response to this article the company promised to stop suing customers to force them to follow through on sale contracts. That sounds like a constructive change.
444.
by iudqnolq 3y ago
The risk was that the seller would realize the buyer was a company with VC money and an investment in the name. The broker thought that the seller might ask for an order of magnitude more if they knew that.
445.
by iudqnolq 3y ago
In this specific case the broker had a good counterargument: If the seller googled "SuperTokens" they'd find SuperTokens.io and realize the buyer had VC funding and an investment in the brand. The broker convincingly argued i
446.
by iudqnolq 3y ago
Huh, I have the opposite reaction. One of Dart's biggest problems is that many people have the impression that Google doesn't take it seriously internally and will abandon it soon. Posting on an external site (weakly) corroborates
447.
by iudqnolq 3y ago
You've identified a lot of complexity. But the answer is not to throw up your hands and declare everything equally unknowable, it's to do the hard work to figure out what's actually going on. That's not something we can
448.
by iudqnolq 3y ago
You're mostly right. Bringing up tire irons is unfair when I explicitly mentioned things like flip-flops. I think a better example might be peaceful protest. Sure you can just not do that, but a reasonable person might want to protest.
449.
by iudqnolq 3y ago
You're assuming the rules you need to follow are a superset of the plain text of the law as written. This is incorrect. One example: assault with a deadly weapon. The definition of "deadly weapon" various wildly in different
450.
by iudqnolq 3y ago
Russia using a dirty bomb is unlikely, but you're wrong about the reason why. Ukraine doesn't have anything economically worth what Russia is doing. At this point they're fighting because they don't want to have lost. A

More ›