itvision

9 ms·

91.
by itvision 2y ago
> Sure, then after 2 or 3 days it pops up again. Citations needed. Doesn't happen to anyone else but you. > Oh, too bad, You should turn it on, I will remind you in a few days. > 3 days, 5 days Oh, Sorry, never is NOT an optio
92.
by itvision 2y ago
You claimed you can "easily link applications statically and have them work everywhere all the time". I said that even linking with LGPL is a task almost everyone avoids (NVIDIA being an exception). You cannot link with GPL _at al
93.
by itvision 2y ago
Install WireShark and PROVE that Windows is leaking data. I've challenged you a couple of times already. You keep writing walls of text without proving anything you claim. You've not proven that you can "easily" run old
94.
by itvision 2y ago
Can you stop making shit up? I dare you to grab a Linux distro from the late 90s/earlier 00s and run any application that uses GTK1 or Qt1/2 on your Ubuntu 24. Without spending insurmountable amounts of time. You will fail miser
95.
by itvision 2y ago
Oh god. 1. Is Wikipedia _page_ an authority? 2. Does Wikipedia page buy operating systems and software for them? No? That's what I thought. Where's native commercial applications for Linux aside from very few specialized ones? Whe
96.
by itvision 2y ago
> You are calling the Xorg X11 Xorg, which is wrong Xorg has been the de-facto X11 implementation on Linux for the past 25 years. First XFree86, then it was superseded by Xorg. You're being nit picky only that's not a counter a
97.
by itvision 2y ago
Try to run an unsigned installer in Windows 10/11 and tell me how it worked for you. This is how it works and looks: https://docs.anythingllm.com/installation-desktop/windows https://github.com/git
98.
by itvision 2y ago
> Then you acknowledge that what you said earlier was untrue. Where did I? Or something that's available to 0.0001% of its users has become an OS "feature"? Who are you kidding, man? What else, you gonna claim Linux is &qu
99.
by itvision 2y ago
https://doc.qt.io/qt-6/licensing.html Now, https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#LGPLStaticVsDynami... > For the purpose of complying with the LGPL (any extant version: v2, v2.1 or v3): &gt
100.
by itvision 2y ago
Not a single Windows MacOS iOS Android user knows what their display server is and how it works. Xorg is being deprecated and replaced with semi-broken something where tons of functions only work in KDE and Gnome. That's all you need t
101.
by itvision 2y ago
> I would not call limping along from extreme levels of telemetry, AV and other bloat “works great” 2 billion users don't notice too much "limping" and "telemetry". 1. This entire post is whataboutism, the articl
102.
by itvision 2y ago
Linux is not an OS and that's an indisputable fact. An OS must have: * Stable API/ABIs including for the kernel * Wide software compatibility * Decent QA/QC * Can be used with any hardware it's
103.
by itvision 2y ago
For 99.99999% average people out there none of this utter cryptic crap works even remotely which basically means it doesn't exist. Can you stop with anecdotal evidence? I don't care that you can make old software works. I can do a
104.
by itvision 2y ago
Windows gives a semblance of trusted code, also Microsoft sells certificates to developers. Nothing (!) like that exists in the Linux world aside from PGP cross singing which barely any projects use because of its sheer complexity. Don&#x27
105.
by itvision 2y ago
> Saying an ability to run older binaries does not exist is just wrong. For 99.99% of users this "ability" does not exist. End of story. Period. I don't care about hacks on tops of tricks on top of hacks. People are not i
106.
by itvision 2y ago
> All I’m saying is that a position “desktop Linux can’t into games” is very very wrong in 2024. Ping me when you find a way to play modern online Windows games with a kernel level anticheat. Oh, and people don't care that Linux can
107.
by itvision 2y ago
> You literally have to reinstall windows because of how broken it got, and that's somehow okay? Last time I did it was in the Windows XP SP0 days. > The amount of BSOD I've seen and unfixable issues after spending hours goo
108.
by itvision 2y ago
> That's one way of dealing with it. Windows can be reinstalled, Linux bugs never go away by themselves. > You chose to debug the issue and help. No, people don't do that in Windows because Microsoft has much better QA/
109.
by itvision 2y ago
> has ignored it's developments to this extent What have I ignored precisely? Bugs? Regressions? Missing features? Lack of funding? Xorg being deprecated, Wayland being all the rage while being usable only in Gnome and KDE? > Man
110.
by itvision 2y ago
Takes literally 2 minutes of Google searching to remove.
111.
by itvision 2y ago
> You're just a hater. Yeah, with hundreds of contributions to multiple Linux projects including the Linux kernel, GCC, KDE, Wine, etc. A total hater. > How you have to tweak registry to remove the ad, but still can't get ri
112.
by itvision 2y ago
1. How many people use Steam Deck or Asus whatever as a desktop OS for running actual productivity applications, doing work, printing and scanning, installing an removing apps, and not just running games curated by Valve? 2. Can you install
113.
by itvision 2y ago
You've not read the article at all and it explains full well what constitutes an OS. The Linux kernel is NOT an OS. Any given Linux distro which is not compatible with any other Linux distro or even its own earlier or later versions co
114.
by itvision 2y ago
LD_LIBRARY_PATH again? Can you stop for a second and realize your "solutions" are absolute unmitigated crap and 99.999% of people of the world wouldn't bother even if they could? In Windows you don't have to do that. You
115.
by itvision 2y ago
Virtualization and sandbox environment code execution have been available for years now in multiple Windows AVs. And it works great. Linux on the other hand has absolutely nothing and it's still "OK". "Windows is not per
116.
by itvision 2y ago
> This is untrue. You can run old Linux binaries on modern Linux systems if you have the older libraries. Again, 0.01% of people in the world could do it, 0.0001% would do it. That's all you need to know about Linux compatibility. A
117.
by itvision 2y ago
I have no assumptions. Windows is installed on 2 billion PCs, give or take. It works great on them, too. Long gone are the days of malware waves or driver failures that break the system. Linux is on 40 millions. And the amount of pain I see
118.
by itvision 2y ago
Could you be specific about what constitutes "a rant"? And no I've spent far less time "fixing" Windows. In fact I don't remember doing that ever. I've had multiple cases when Windows stopped booting and i
119.
by itvision 2y ago
Yes, look up the author's name. Look at their contributions to the Linux kernel, GCC, KDE, Wine, and many other projects. A total clickbait for sure.
120.
by itvision 2y ago
You cannot statically compile a lot of stuff. Too many Linux libraries are GPLed, and that only works for open source applications. And then one day the underlying libraries will have security problems. Your statically linked application ha

More ›