itrekkie

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by itrekkie 16y ago

   I was wondering the same thing. Unfortunately, the first day there was no email and it was sitting in an unmarked brown box all day. I hope that changes. I've had packages taken before, and I have to wonder if Google is keeping tabs on them
2. 2.▲
   by itrekkie 16y ago

   I did the same thing, but first from the browser on Tuesday. Instant regret for filling out both, but the longer form has a lot more info that I thought they'd like. Either way, something worked. It showed up today.
3. 3.▲
   by itrekkie 16y ago

   I'd be interested to know how this compares to js-model ( http://benpickles.github.com/js-model/ ). Anyone have any insight?
4. 4.▲
   by itrekkie 16y ago

   How would you pronounce it?-couldn't find anything on their site. I could only think of one way to make the name fit into these syllable structures, but glottal stop is missing from its inventory. No diphthongs either! That's odd. How does
5. 5.▲
   by itrekkie 16y ago

   You're right, we are dealing with two different moods. I'd argue that in this case the clause is subjunctive (contrary to fact) rendered with the indicative mood. This is increasingly common, and in many dialects standard. The question then
6. 6.▲
   by itrekkie 16y ago

   Although this bugs me too, it's not incorrect. It's perfectly understandable in American English, and "correct" in other varieties of English.
7. 7.▲
   by itrekkie 16y ago

   I think it's almost silly to admit "log in" has the correct meaning and then quibble about the orthography. I'd contend that it very much is a verb in the same vein of phrasal and separable verbs as found in, e.g., German and English. The f