isuguitar121

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by isuguitar121 11mo ago

   Okay well I am not commenting on what that group did so I don't see how I am gatekeeping anything. I am looking at this paper and saying I don't see the Autonomous Discovery claim but I do see novel AI contributions to science.
2. 2.▲
   by isuguitar121 11mo ago

   How did I say that? This is really cool and advancing but calling it "Autonomous Discovery" is very bold claim and needs strong evidence. I don't see it. They could have claimed it differently but they chose those words and t
3. 3.▲
   by isuguitar121 11mo ago

   It seems like these "discoveries" are mostly "We provided a dataset and Kosmos found the same conclusion as the scientist." This is an advancement but those datasets are not random in any sense. They were created to supp
4. 4.▲
   by isuguitar121 2y ago

   I think this part of the conclusion is pretty foreboding for the whole profession. It seems like there is a lot of cognitive dissonance on interpreting what the future holds for engineers in the software industry. “However, they could also