isralcduke

3 ms·

1.
by isralcduke 2y ago
as a designer who can do HTML and CSS, it’s nice to read that there are some orgs who appreciate this. but I still try to avoid JS and use chatgpt or something when I must write JS. sorry not sorry
2.
by isralcduke 2y ago
Again with the emails and how custom components aren’t proven in the browser’s accessibility tree
3.
by isralcduke 2y ago
Designer who can do some web dev here. When I work with real developers I engage with them to show them designs for feasibility, timelines, accessibility. But when I have worked with designers who don’t have these skills, and I have to brea
4.
by isralcduke 3y ago
so true : The process is likely to look ugly to bystanders, and include a lot of splash and noise that doesn't obviously advance progress.
5.
by isralcduke 3y ago
For me, it’s a combination of reading, more reading, and often re-reading to squeeze out more understanding or to be thorough. at first, idk when too much is too much because i have no domain knowledge on the subject. Then it’s using the kn
6.
by isralcduke 3y ago
A few reasons, but I admit that doing so is becoming less attractive as tools grow in capability. 1. to think through information architecture and content structure, especially for accessibility 2. to stay familiar with the basics and found
7.
by isralcduke 4y ago
Does it help create tagged PDFs? Tagged PDFs are necessary to be accessible
8.
by isralcduke 7y ago
Designer here, mostly in the same boat. Begin small moves to have your data in other, non Apple sources. Maybe put calendars in Google or Outlook, for example. Put Notes entries in Markdown files (there’s apps for that). I don’t know the ex
9.
Letter and symbol misrecognition in highly legible typefaces (2015)(typography.guru)
33 points by isralcduke 9y ago|7 comments
10.
by isralcduke 11y ago
i suppose that "possible" depends on the denomination or sect, as their beliefs differ as to whether things or ideas can be transmitted across such a divide. But, if you're asking this because of a loved one you've lost,