isodev

28 ms·

511.
by isodev 1y ago
It's strange, my real life experience is very different than yours. Unless you're training AI to do something shady, it's really no bother at all. In fact, most of what the AI Act requires, you have to do anyway for a good mo
512.
by isodev 1y ago
Omarchy is basically the cyber truck of distros
513.
by isodev 1y ago
> more a topic of plagiarism than copyright You’re right, in the context of a technical legal interpretation they’re different. In the context of right or wrong, they amount to the same. > anyone who studies GCC internals LLMs are not
514.
by isodev 1y ago
If I’m the grandparent comment, it was a big part of what I mean. Stolen/Unknown content goes in for training, verbatim or very close “inspired by” code comes out and there is no way to verify the source - “violation as a service”.
515.
by isodev 1y ago
Not really, only a handful of authorities have weighed on that and most of them in a country where model providers literally buy themselves policy and judges.
516.
by isodev 1y ago
Lies defined by it's not the truth. No slope here, really.
517.
by isodev 1y ago
> There is also, of course, the question of copyright infringements in code produced by LLMs, usually in the form of training data leaking into the model's output Well yes, LLMs like Claude Code are merely a "copyright violatio
518.
by isodev 1y ago
I imagine larger part of the developer community does not, in fact, know that GitHub is not git and one can get everything they need without feeding their code to Microsoft's AI empire. Just another "Embrace, extend, and extinguis
519.
by isodev 1y ago
The opposite of what the blogpost informs us they did? Provide more tools and systems to discover and diagnose vulnerabilities, make components open source/open audit, etc. There is non perfect system, but a closed imperfect system is
520.
by isodev 1y ago
> I assume Apple is probably going to bring this back to pacify Pegasus and Predator were VERY widely publicised exploits in iOS, I find it shortsighted for Apple not to have control over how these get identified in the first place. It&#
521.
by isodev 1y ago
Indeed, "cross-platform UI" can only be as good as the average between all the platforms it supports and it usually ends up costing a lot more than using the native UI kits of each platform. Kotlin Multiplatform has been and conti
522.
by isodev 1y ago
While I can imagine this is very frustrating, I think we can definitely see "facial accessories" becoming more mainstream as ways to evade "unsolicited surveillance". Like... imagine someone invents glasses with an outwa
523.
by isodev 1y ago
No, no, no..., make it stop before it lays eggs.
524.
by isodev 1y ago
Exactly this. There is no way not to choose the App Store, regardless of the price. Apple goes further by making users believe alternatives are "less secure" and what not (which is not true) so it's not just about distributio
525.
by isodev 1y ago
Why the UK specifically? The App Store monopoly is driven by its world-wide presence, I think it should be global revenue, and a fine to match.
526.
by isodev 1y ago
I don't know how it is there, but here those signs near schools light up and blink during school hours (really can't miss it). And for signs that do not, I think school days are pretty fixed, shouldn't be difficult to program
527.
by isodev 1y ago
Do you expect elections are still a viable option in this circumstance? It's beginning to sound like the results will be just set to a default, like the last presidential election in Russia: "78%+ for Putin/Trump".
528.
by isodev 1y ago
Aren’t they supposed to read signs? Otherwise they’d also ignore the overhead speed limits on the highway for traffic jams / air quality adjustments during the day.
529.
by isodev 1y ago
I don’t think they’re selling it (at least that) but it’s spotlight and the browser … exactly where one tends to type sensitive things. It’s unsettling to know everything I typed becomes a dataset to circulate all divisions within a big cor
530.
by isodev 1y ago
> Apple has taken steps Apple engages in “privacy washing” - they take steps in the name of privacy when it disadvantages their competitors. At the same time, Apple has no problem collecting say Spotlight and Safari search terms … or “fe
531.
by isodev 1y ago
My point was that the approach is not effectual when the guilty party is a corporation with near infinite resources. Take Apple for example, it takes years just to complete a single “unlawful termination” suit, and it would be … decades bef
532.
by isodev 1y ago
> The problem here is not the law Of course. The law is clear, the intent is clear and the guidelines are clear. I think the biggest challenge (and the reason why it feels this is everywhere) is because of the handful of "big corpor
533.
by isodev 1y ago
I’m happy the EC is pushing back. The arguments given by Apple during the hearing were absurd and it’s high time we put some “safe area” around corps. Also huge thanks to the FSFE for putting this together and articulating why “innovation”
534.
by isodev 1y ago
AI was created as “enshittification engine” so no.
535.
by isodev 1y ago
I would’ve killed it even before user testing. It’s borderline malicious that this thing was shipped in the first place
536.
by isodev 1y ago
Beam languages have a different concurrency model than what you’re used to in JVM world. I suggest that you try some of them in a real project (even without actors).
537.
by isodev 1y ago
I wouldn’t risk even downloading this. It’s amazing how supposedly “tech savvy” people let themselves be mislead by hype.
538.
by isodev 1y ago
In Elixir/Gleam/OTP.., the entire program is a collection of progresses which are isolated from each other. Even if you don’t implement the actor pattern, passing state between processes and coordinating is a solved problem. We ha
539.
by isodev 1y ago
Very cool! Looking forward to trying it out.
540.
by isodev 1y ago
Yes, in a way. The rampant exaggeration of the usefulness of LLMs and the fact that clearly not enough "people in tech" are saying no to their managers stuffing every single product with something "AI"-ish means we defin

More ›