Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
islewis
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
31.
▲
by
islewis
2y ago
My first interpretation of this is that it's jazzed-up Chain-Of-Thought. The results look pretty promising, but i'm most interested in this: > Therefore, after weighing multiple factors including user experience, competitive ad
32.
▲
by
islewis
2y ago
Can someone explain to me how the EV can be so incredibly low? I know the answer is because people will buy the tickets no matter what, but even compared to other losing games the lottery comes away looking like an absolute bandit. A run on
33.
▲
Roblox announces AI model for 3D game worlds
(arstechnica.com)
14 points
by
islewis
2y ago
|
0 comments
34.
▲
by
islewis
2y ago
Thanks for the context. I'm still not certain that an instance of collusion on the price of bread in 2015 implies wider collusion in 2024. Ideally, the data would be proving this, but I guess my skepticism is the cost of making a claim
35.
▲
by
islewis
2y ago
Big fan of any data aggregation projects like this, especially with such a relatable theme. However it feel like the conclusion might be jumping the gun a bit. Instead of "Think there is collusion" -> finding the data top suppo
36.
▲
The coolest startup in the Bay Area is a baseball team
(techcrunch.com)
1 points
by
islewis
2y ago
|
0 comments
37.
▲
by
islewis
2y ago
I'm curious how the aggregate results from this test would compare to the exact same test named "Is my green your green?" I could see the title influencing some of the more nuanced decisions in the middle.
38.
▲
by
islewis
2y ago
I've been either stunned, or disappointed depending on the word. "hello" gives four images of the same building with "hello" clearly written, as well as a few images of "hello" grafiti. Impressed "tab
39.
▲
by
islewis
2y ago
"good enough" is incredibly subjective here. Maybe good enough for you, but there are many things that are not possible with either the dataset or the weights being available.
40.
▲
by
islewis
2y ago
Could you give some examples of dependence without correlation?
41.
▲
by
islewis
2y ago
Karpathy is _much_ more knowledgeable about this than I am, but I feel like this post is missing something. Go is a game that is fundamentally too complex for humans to solve. We've known this since way back before AlphaGo. Since human
42.
▲
by
islewis
2y ago
While I agree with your platform point, I think you still need to address OP's question of > What is their route in profitability when Meta is giving away similar tech for free?
43.
▲
by
islewis
2y ago
> Reed Hastings announced that the company was expanding into almost every country around the world — including markets with subpar broadband infrastructure and consumers who primarily accessed the internet from their mobile phone. The o
44.
▲
by
islewis
2y ago
> Nate Silver was both the best and worst thing that happened to these predictions. Can you elaborate on this opinion further? I have a hard time aligning the rest of your post with what looks like your thesis.
45.
▲
by
islewis
2y ago
Could a hardware authenticator (Yubikey) be a workaround for this? Or are there services which don't support this?
46.
▲
by
islewis
2y ago
> Globle Similar to Globle is Worldle - https://worldle.teuteuf.fr/
47.
▲
by
islewis
2y ago
IMO this is the real issue. I guarantee you that they _will_ have another production bug like this sometime in the future (every fast paced project will). You'd hope this next one wont take 5 days to identify.
48.
▲
by
islewis
2y ago
> First, let’s prioritize open source models and more tailored AI applications to shape the competitive landscape and create real opportunities for startups My read on this is YC believes that small companies will (are?) be locked out of
49.
▲
by
islewis
2y ago
> GPT-6 might need about 10% of the world’s computers, a large power plant’s worth of energy ... Probably this looks like a town-sized data center attached to a lot of solar panels or a nuclear reactor. > GPT-7 might need all of the w
50.
▲
by
islewis
2y ago
Interested to hear more about this. What works well? What didn't?
51.
▲
by
islewis
2y ago
> It’s disheartening to see very technically adept people still find this exciting. I dont think this is what people find amusing. I think people are more so surprised that Google, the trillion dollar company, has pushed an update that
52.
▲
by
islewis
2y ago
> In my opinion they have harmed the cause more than anything else: instead of actual repair material (like schematics or low/high level servicing manuals) Not sure I understand this take. $BRAND's role is to sell devices. IFi
53.
▲
by
islewis
2y ago
I appreciate your response, thanks for the context.
54.
▲
by
islewis
2y ago
I'm curious why they would go through the hassle of raising a relatively small amount this way instead of just asking a bit more from the VC's. Probably this? > the RUV will sign a proxy voting agreement with Framework’s Founde
55.
▲
by
islewis
2y ago
It feels to me like YC's name-drop doesn't have a purpose beyond just attention/view grabbing, despite there being a few nuggets of solid reasoning sprinkled throughout the post. > That’s 1.25%. To be fair, that’s actually
56.
▲
by
islewis
3y ago
I know we won't get it this from FB, but I'd be really interested to see how the relationship of compute power to engineering hours scales. They mention custom building as much as they can. If FB magically has the option to 10x th
57.
▲
by
islewis
3y ago
I don't think "lazy" is the word I would use, but I can see how some would see it like that. In my mind, GPT (and LLM's) are just the next layer of abstractions on top of a already massive stack of technical abstractions
58.
▲
by
islewis
3y ago
I doubt there's much thought behind it, and just the fact that each "Request" is written by a different person.
59.
▲
by
islewis
3y ago
Given Karpathy's draw towards teaching/educational content, I've wondered where he falls on the spectrum between Sam Altman's interpretation of "Open" in OpenAI, and someone on the opposite end (like Musk). I&#
60.
▲
by
islewis
3y ago
> Messy branding is now par for the course at Apple. The iPad line alone is something out of a Dell catalog: iPad, iPad 10thgen, iPad Air, iPad Mini, iPad Pro. a comment from another thread this morning- https://news.ycombin
More ›