Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
iskander
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
61 ms
·
601.
▲
Should you apply PCA to your data?
(blog.explainmydata.com)
1 points
by
iskander
14y ago
|
0 comments
602.
▲
Comparison of machine learning classifiers for medium-sized data (part 2)
(blog.explainmydata.com)
7 points
by
iskander
14y ago
|
0 comments
603.
▲
Finding a needle in a data haystack: faster feature selection
(blog.explainmydata.com)
1 points
by
iskander
14y ago
|
0 comments
604.
▲
How does Microsoft's Kinect recognize body parts? [pdf]
(research.microsoft.com)
1 points
by
iskander
14y ago
|
0 comments
605.
▲
by
iskander
14y ago
Any idea what the preferred algorithm would be for linear SVMs with dense data? (other than SGD, of course)
606.
▲
by
iskander
14y ago
I have had the misfortune of working with Q. It's a very clever little language that could be a great platform for numerical prototyping. Unfortunately, it's hobbled by a terrible programming culture. The interpreter gives cryptic single-ch
607.
▲
by
iskander
14y ago
They definitely have a physical effect, but does that effect 'treat' depression any better than, say, atropine? ( http://www.medicalobserver.com.au/news/antidepressants-vs-ac... ) The current understanding is that the difference between SSR
608.
▲
by
iskander
14y ago
Regardless of whether anti-depressants are effectual, overprescribed, or totally useless: I think it's amazing that an article arguing the merits of a pharmaceutical treatment can be published without reference to any research. >But tha
609.
▲
by
iskander
14y ago
>about graph theory, it's something that is rarely used, if I need to do something I can grab a book and check it, it's strange to remember this stuff when you don't use it a lot. I don't think you appreciate how pervasively useful a ba
610.
▲
by
iskander
14y ago
s/Special relativity/General relativity Special relativity ignores gravity altogether, whereas general relativity sneaks gravity into the relativistic framework by equating it with curvature. Both theories are, to me, frustratingly intangib
611.
▲
by
iskander
14y ago
The raw quantity of quality content on reddit is staggering. It just requires a little effort on your part to actually make an account and subscribe to good subreddits.
612.
▲
by
iskander
14y ago
Thanks for posting this. The quality of the comments here is otherwise sadly low.
613.
▲
by
iskander
14y ago
You guys seem weirdly resistant on this, but can you please turn off the inline comments? Or at least provide a global option for keeping them off? It makes navigating the songs hard and almost none of the text is ever interesting.
614.
▲
by
iskander
14y ago
Most of my data is too big for CSVs but too small to justify distributed storage. I use HDF5 with chunking and column compression. I think many other people in the sciences and finance also do this (along with using NetCDF).
615.
▲
by
iskander
14y ago
The github links on the samples page are broken (they have 'examples' instead of 'samples' in the path).
616.
▲
by
iskander
14y ago
I'm very curious to see (a) what sort of generative model they're using under the hood, and (b) how they do inference efficiently enough to not dedicate a cluster to each customer.
617.
▲
by
iskander
14y ago
...not when you stick a few hundred of them together and train each on bootstrap samples... (my random forest can beat up your kernel machine any day)
618.
▲
by
iskander
15y ago
From the numpy mailing list ( http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/2012-March/... ): (summarizing how Numba differs from Unladen Swallow) ----- >> what is the difference to http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-3146/ ? To
619.
▲
by
iskander
15y ago
This is pretty close to what I'm doing for my PhD research-- it's an annoyingly hard problem! Travis will probably make smarter design choices than me, but my project has ended up being of limited use due to the non-obvious subset of Python
620.
▲
by
iskander
15y ago
Their sidebar explaining IQ scores seems a little silly. I'd like to see a citations for average scores of Nobel prize winners. Also, who went back in time to administer an intelligence test to Mozart?
621.
▲
by
iskander
15y ago
Often the tweaks are then used to inspire more solid mathematical footing. An interesting example of this is going on with the recent surge of interest in neural networks and deep learning at machine learning conferences. What used to be ha
622.
▲
A minimalist compiler to help you learn LLVM's OCaml bindings
(github.com)
1 points
by
iskander
15y ago
|
0 comments
623.
▲
by
iskander
15y ago
There's a lot of dissonance between: > It's currently in a renewed and stronger Eternal September. >The top voted comments on threads about censorship are mostly 1 to 3 months old users. and >Sure, a lot of questionable/creepy
624.
▲
by
iskander
15y ago
I hold his writing to a non-academic standard and generally enjoy it. I did, however, get very angry watching him give a lecture. He seemed so enamored with weaving a vague but sexy story that I don't think even he believed his own thesis.
625.
▲
by
iskander
15y ago
I would like to ban the word smart from common discourse. It looks like it describes something, but actually masks the reality of the how someone can look 'smart' in a situation.
626.
▲
by
iskander
15y ago
A doctorate in education is of dubious worth. As an academic field education research doesn't yet have the tools of structures to answer interesting questions. In place of rigorous theories there is currently a swamp of poorly verified or u
627.
▲
by
iskander
15y ago
Very cool article. I have to admit I'm a little frightened of the bulk and complexity of the RPython translation pipeline. I'm not happy about the prospect of waiting an hour to learn my code runs afoul of poorly documented type inference l
628.
▲
by
iskander
15y ago
Like several other people here, flickr is one of the few web services I pay for. It's hard to imagine that it's not profitable. So why does Yahoo treat it so poorly?
629.
▲
by
iskander
15y ago
It strangely skips to lesson 20, where you get a taste of some esoteric features and syntactic conveniences from the latest release.
630.
▲
by
iskander
15y ago
For anyone who wants to try out the language, here's an OCaml tutorial with an in-browser interpreter: http://try.ocamlpro.com/
More ›