irutiw22

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by irutiw22 5y ago

   Since you work in this field, I'd be interested if you would really qualify this as innovation. I have posted already in several places in this thread about the fact that Bionic Reader is at least 3 years old already. Someone else also
2. 2.▲
   by irutiw22 5y ago

   I think the opposite is true. Patents are hampering further progress that would built upon the innovation or make use of it to increase productivity. but said progress often is not happening, if the costs of obtaining a license is high, o
3. 3.▲
   by irutiw22 5y ago

   I have mentioned this a few times here already, but I will mention it again, even if I risk looking like a spammer, as it seems this point hans't been made strongly enough in this thread: This discovery is not new. A different company
4. 4.▲
   by irutiw22 5y ago

   Just FYI, as I detailed in my top-level comment: While it is a really nice tool, it is already a few years old, so I'm not sure if it qualifies as innovative. See: https://web.archive.org/web/20190119032121/ht
5. 5.▲
   by irutiw22 5y ago

   For everyone who think this is new stuff: It is not new. There was another company in the German speaking space, Vienna more exactly, see craftworks.at, that offered almost the exact same product already back in 2019, perhaps even earlier